Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Usha Rani vs the State of Karnataka

Usha Rani vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Apr 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1693331

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WPHC/39/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Usha Rani

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 28th day of april, 2025 present the hon'ble mr justice v kameswar rao and the hon'ble mr justice t.m.nadaf writ petition habeas corpus no.39 of 2025 between: usha rani w/o prashanth h r aged about 35 years r/at no.390, chaithanya nilaya sadashivanagara hassan - 573 201 …petitioner (by sri lethif b, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka represented by home secretary vidhana soudha digitally bangalore- 560 001 signed byprajwal a 2. the state of karnataka location: represented by superintendent of police high court hassan district- 573 201of karnataka3. the state of karnataka represented by inspector of police pension mohalla police hassan district -573 201 …respondents (by sri b.a.belliappa, spp alongwith sri thejesh p, hcgp) -2- this wp(hc) is filed under articles 226 and 227of constitution of india, praying to issue writ of habeas corpus or any other writ or direct the respondents to set at liberty and produce the brother of the petitioner before this hon'ble court and any other equitable order which this hon'ble court may deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice v kameswar rao and hon'ble mr justice t.m.nadaforal order(per: hon'ble mr justice v kameswar rao) learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. the memo reads as under: “the counsel for the petitioner hereby humbly prays that this hon’ble court may kindly allow to withdraw the above petition. hence this memo, the same may kindly be taken on record in the interest of justice.” memo is taken on record. petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (v kameswar rao) (t.m.nadaf) kcm list no.: 1 sl no.: 1

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION HABEAS CORPUS No.39 OF 2025 BETWEEN: USHA RANI W/O PRASHANTH H R AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO.390, CHAITHANYA NILAYA SADASHIVANAGARA HASSAN - 573 201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI LETHIF B, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY HOME SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA Digitally BANGALORE- 560 001 signed by

PRAJWAL A      2.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Location:            REPRESENTED BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
High Court           HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 201

of Karnataka

3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE PENSION MOHALLA POLICE HASSAN DISTRICT -573 201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP ALONGWITH SRI THEJESH P, HCGP) -2- THIS WP(HC) IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO SET AT LIBERTY AND PRODUCE THE BROTHER OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT AND ANY OTHER EQUITABLE ORDER WHICH THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: “The Counsel for the petitioner hereby humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may kindly allow to withdraw the above petition. Hence this memo, the same may kindly be taken on record in the interest of justice.” Memo is taken on record. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (V KAMESWAR RAO) (T.M.NADAF) kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial