Full Judgment
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 12627 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. NAGENDRAPPA, S/O LATE DURGA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT GUDALU VILLAGE,
2. SMT. HUCHENGAMMA W/O LATE DURGAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
3. SRI. RAMACHANDRAPPA S/O LATE RUDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS Digitally signed by
KAVYA R 4. SRI. MAHANTESHA Location: High S/O LATE MALIYAPPA Court of AGED ABOUT 50 YEARSKarnataka
5. SRI. HARALAIAH, S/O LATE MARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT GUDALU VILLAGE
6. SRI. BASAVARAJ
S/O LATE THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, -2- R/A NAYAKANAHATTI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 522. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. D. GANGADHARA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT,
3. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, CHITRADURGA SUB DIVISION,
4. THASILDAR, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHALLAKERE - 577 522.
5. SRI. JABI SAB, S/O SRI. BASHA SAB, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/A A.K. CHICKEN SHOP, PRASANNA TALKIES, CHITRADURGA TOWN, -3-
6. SMT. IMAMI BAI WIFE OF SRI. ISMAIL SAB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A JAGALUR TOWN, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 528.
7. SMT. IMAMI BAI, WIFE OF BASHA SAB AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT NO. 273, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, CHITRADURGA - 577 502. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R1 TO R4 TO ACCEPT THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE THASILDAR, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT,
IN NO. SCPTL.CR.39.2005-2006, DATED 19.1.2006 (ANNEXURE-C) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER
The order passed by the Assistant Commissioner under section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short, 'Act') as per Annexure-N the petitioner has a remedy by way of revision under section 136(3) of the Act. -4- Reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail a remedy of revision, the writ petition stands disposed of. The registry shall forthwith return all certified copies after securing photo copies of the same. In the event, revision is filed within a period of four weeks from the date of order passed by this Court, the petitioner shall be granted benefit under section 14 of the Limitation Act excluding the period spent before this Court. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7 CT: BHK