K.Divya Vs The Additional Registrar General

K.Divya vs The Additional Registrar General

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 02, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1688489

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1688489
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran,Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan
Decided On: Jan 02, 2026
Case Number: WP(MD)/35192/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Divya

Respondent

The Additional Registrar General

Excerpt

.....16.10.2025, 23.10.2025, 25.10.2025, 28.10.2025, 29.10.2025, 24.11.2025 and 25.11.2025 issued by the 4th respondent against the petitioner, quash them as arbitrary, illegal and violative of articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of india and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant benefits, backwages, continuity of service and monetary benefits within a stipulated time.for petitioner : mr.n.karthikkanna for respondents : mr.d.sivaramanorder[order of the court was made by dr.g.jayachandran, j.] this writ petition is filed challenging the suspension order, dated 17.10.2025, placing the petitioner under suspension pending enquiry and the other consequential memorandums / show cause notices issued by the additional chief judicial magistrate, madurai, against the petitioner.2. today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learnedcounsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the impugned suspension order has been revoked without prejudice to the disciplinary proceedings contemplated and the petitioner has been reinstated into service in the same post.3. in view of the above submission, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.[g.j., j.] [k.k.r.k., j.] 02.01.2026 ncc : yes / no index : yes / no internet : yes / no krk to: 1.the additional registrar general, madurai bench of madras high court, madurai-23. 2.the principal district & sessions judge, 3.the chief judicial magistrate, 4.the additional chief judicial magistrate,dr.g.jayachandran, j.andk.k.ramakrishnan, j.krk and w.m.p.(md) nos.27903 & 27905 of 02.01.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.27903 & 27905 of 2025 K.Divya ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Additional Registrar General Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai-23 2.Principal District & Session Judge Madurai-625 020 3.The Chief Judicial Magistrate Madurai-625 020 4.The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Madurai-625 020 ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned suspension order dated 17.10.2025 in Ka.No.75/2025 and the consequential office memoranda/show-cause notice dated 16.10.2025, 23.10.2025, 25.10.2025, 28.10.2025, 29.10.2025, 24.11.2025 and 25.11.2025 issued by the 4th respondent against the petitioner, quash them as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant benefits, backwages, continuity of service and monetary benefits within a stipulated time.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Karthikkanna For Respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.] This writ petition is filed challenging the suspension order, dated 17.10.2025, placing the petitioner under suspension pending enquiry and the other consequential memorandums / show cause notices issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai, against the petitioner.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned

counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the impugned suspension order has been revoked without prejudice to the disciplinary proceedings contemplated and the petitioner has been reinstated into service in the same post.

3. In view of the above submission, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

[G.J., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.] 02.01.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk To: 1.The Additional Registrar General, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai-23. 2.The Principal District & Sessions Judge, 3.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, 4.The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

AND

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

krk and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.27903 & 27905 of 02.01.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties K.Divya vs The Additional Registrar General Same Judge Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran,Honourable Mr Justice K...

Writ of certiorari Registrar General Without prejudice Pertaining to high court Has been