Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M/S Sgr Construction vs the Commissioner

M/S Sgr Construction vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Apr 01, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1686937

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/9224/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S Sgr Construction

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

.....aged about 26 years,8. the asst. executive engineer sub division, bescom, j.p.nagar, zonal office, bengaluru - 560 078. -3-9. the asst. executive engineer,bwssb, kothanur dinne, bengaluru - 560 077. …respondents (by sri. satyanand b.s., advocate for r1 to r4 sri. h.mujtaba, advocate for r5 to r7 sri. amruthesh.c., advocate for r9) this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to direct the r1 to 4 to initiate, complete the action against the r5 to 7 as per the provisional order dtd 23.09.2021 passed u/s 248(1) of the bbmp act vide annexure-s, notice dtd 23.09.2021 issue u/s 248(2) of the bbmp act vide annexure-t, the confirmation order dtd 05.10.2021 issued u/s 248(3) of the bbmp act 2020 vide annexurew and etc. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice s sunil dutt yadavoral ordermemo for withdrawal has been filed which reads as hereunder: "the petitioner above named states that, the above writ petition has been filed against the respondents questioning the order dated 23.09.2021, 05.10.2021 vide -4- annexures - s, t & w. the petitioner doesn't want to prosecute the above writ petition against the respondents, hence, the writ petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn, in the interest of justice." in light of the same, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (s sunil dutt yadav) judge dha list no.: 1 sl no.: 44

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 9224 OF 2022 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: M/s. SGR CONSTRUCTION A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI C. RAJESH, S/o G. CHINNAPPA NAIDU, AGED 41 YEARS, NO.510, 10 TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR, HBCS LAYOUT, I STAGE, PADMANABHA NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 070. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.B. CHANDRACHOODA., ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed 1. THE COMMISSIONER, by VIJAYA P BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, Location: HIGH COURT (BBMP), N.R.SQUARE, OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 002.

2. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, BBMP, BOMMANAHALLI RANGE, NO.1, BEGUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 068.

3. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BBMP, KONANAKUNTE WARD OFFICE, KONANAKUNTE, -2- BENGALURU - 560 062.

4. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, BBMP, N.R.SQUARE, SOUTH RANGE, BENGALURU -560 002.

5. DR.KISHORI G.H. W/o. LATE P.J.YOGANARASIMHA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

6. DR. SANJANA YOGANARASIMHA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, HASSAN, KARNATAKA -573 202.

7. MISS SPANDANA YOGANARASIMHA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,

8. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SUB DIVISION, BESCOM, J.P.NAGAR, ZONAL OFFICE, BENGALURU - 560 078. -3-

9. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

BWSSB, KOTHANUR DINNE, BENGALURU - 560 077. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SATYANAND B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4 SRI. H.MUJTABA, ADVOCATE FOR R5 TO R7 SRI. AMRUTHESH.C., ADVOCATE FOR R9) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 TO 4 TO INITIATE, COMPLETE THE ACTION AGAINST THE R5 TO 7 AS PER THE PROVISIONAL ORDER DTD 23.09.2021 PASSED U/S 248(1) OF THE BBMP ACT VIDE ANNEXURE-S, NOTICE DTD 23.09.2021 ISSUE U/S 248(2) OF THE BBMP ACT VIDE ANNEXURE-T, THE CONFIRMATION ORDER DTD 05.10.2021 ISSUED U/S 248(3) OF THE BBMP ACT 2020 VIDE ANNEXUREW AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

ORAL ORDER

Memo for withdrawal has been filed which reads as hereunder: "The Petitioner above named states that, the above writ petition has been filed against the Respondents questioning the order dated 23.09.2021, 05.10.2021 vide -4- Annexures - S, T & W. The Petitioner doesn't want to prosecute the above writ petition against the Respondents, hence, the writ petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn, in the interest of justice." In light of the same, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial