Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Abdul Sameed Vs Sukirtharaj

Abdul Sameed vs Sukirtharaj

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 02, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1683622

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP(MD)/19213/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Sameed

Respondent

Sukirtharaj

Excerpt

c.m.p.(md).no.19213 of 2025 in s.a(md)sr.no.98930 of 2025k.murali shankar, j.the civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 14 days in filing the appal against the judgment and decree, dated 24.06.2025 in a.s.no.63 of 2018 on the file of the principal sub court, palani (camp at kodaikanal, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 22.06.2018 in o.s.no.47 of 2010 on the file of the district munsif cum judicial magistrate court, kodaikanal.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners,learned counsel for the respondent and also perused the records. 3.the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that they are not having objections to allow this petition. 4.considering the reasons assigned and also taking note of the quantum of delay, this court is inclined to condone the delay. accordingly, this petition is ordered and the registry is directed to take the appeal on file, if it is otherwise in order and list the matter in the usual course.das 02.01.2026 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.(MD).No.19213 of 2025 in S.A(MD)SR.No.98930 of 2025

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.

The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 14 days in filing the appal against the judgment and decree, dated 24.06.2025 in A.S.No.63 of 2018 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Palani (camp at Kodaikanal, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 22.06.2018 in O.S.No.47 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodaikanal.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners,

learned counsel for the respondent and also perused the records. 3.The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that they are not having objections to allow this petition. 4.Considering the reasons assigned and also taking note of the quantum of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to take the appeal on file, if it is otherwise in order and list the matter in the usual course.

das 02.01.2026 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Abdul Sameed vs Sukirtharaj Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales