Fareed Ullah Khan vs the State by

Fareed Ullah Khan vs The State by

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Apr 29, 2025

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1682741

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1682741
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: M.Nagaprasanna
Decided On: Apr 29, 2025
Case Number: WP/8235/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fareed Ullah Khan

Respondent

The State by

Excerpt

.....veedhi bengaluru - 560 001.amended vide court order dated 24.03.2025. …respondents (by sri mohammed jaffar shah, aga for r1; sri h.shanthi bhushan, dsgi for r2 and r3; sri veeresh budihal, advocate for r4) this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to-direct the r-2 to renew and issue the passport bearing no. k2647962 dtd 14.03.2012 issued at bangalorer- this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr justice m.nagaprasannaoral orderlearned counsel for petitioner seeks leave of this court to withdraw the petition by filing a memo. -3-2. the memo reads as follows:“1. that the petitioner had filed memo in the above- mentioned case seeking direction for the renewal of his passport in order to travel mecca for the purpose of performing umrah.2. that due to unforeseen delays in the renewal process, the petitioner could not undertake the intended travel within the requisite time.3. that the petitioner has now been informed by the concerned travel agency that currently, no person is permitted to perform umrah, as only hajj pilgrimages are allowed during the upcoming month of june.4. in view of the above circumstances, the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition and seeks permission of this hon'ble court to withdraw the same.5. the petitioner further seeks liberty to file a fresh petition on a distinct cause of action, including that of eternality, at an appropriate stage. wherefore, it is humbly prayed that this hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to dismiss the above petition as not pressed in the interest of the justice.” in terms of the memo, the writ petition stands disposed. sd/- (m.nagaprasanna) judge nvj list no.: 2 sl no.: 36

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 8235 OF 2025 (GM-PASS) BETWEEN: FAREED ULLAH KHAN S/O ARSHAD ULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT 50, 4TH FLOOR, I STAGE, 2ND BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, HBR LAYOUT KALYANNAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 043. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MUZAFFAR AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE BY
SUDDAGUNTEPALYA P.S. REPRESENTED BY Digitally signed by NAGAVENI STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Location: High HIGH COURT BUILDINGS Court of Karnataka BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER OFFICE OF THE PASSPORT OFFICE 8TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095 REP. BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
3. THE SECRETARY THE MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS NO.172, SOUTH BLOCK -2- NEW DELHI - 110 001 REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
4. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR INNOVATIVE BUSINESS CENTER (IBC) OFFICE OF S.P.LOCA V.V.TOWER, PODIUM BLOCK DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001.
AMENDED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 24.03.2025. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1; SRI H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN, DSGI FOR R2 AND R3; SRI VEERESH BUDIHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE R-2 TO RENEW AND ISSUE THE PASSPORT BEARING NO. K2647962 DTD 14.03.2012 ISSUED AT BANGALORER- THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition by filing a memo. -3-

2. The memo reads as follows:

“1. That the petitioner had filed Memo in the above- mentioned case seeking direction for the renewal of his passport in order to travel Mecca for the purpose of performing Umrah.

2. That due to unforeseen delays in the renewal process, the petitioner could not undertake the intended travel within the requisite time.

3. That the petitioner has now been informed by the concerned travel agency that currently, no person is permitted to perform Umrah, as only Hajj pilgrimages are allowed during the upcoming month of June.

4. In view of the above circumstances, the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition and seeks permission of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the same.

5. The petitioner further seeks liberty to file a fresh petition on a distinct cause of action, including that of eternality, at an appropriate stage. WHEREFORE, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to dismiss the above petition as not pressed in the interest of the justice.” In terms of the memo, the writ petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 36

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Fareed Ullah Khan vs The State by Same Judge M.Nagaprasanna