Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Managing Director Vs Raman

The Managing Director vs Raman

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1681301

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP(MD)/20448/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Managing Director

Respondent

Raman

Excerpt

cmp(md) no.20448 of 2025 in cma(md) sr.no.93602 of 2025g.k. ilanthiraiyan,j.andr. poornima,j.(order of the court was made by g.k.ilanthiraiyan,j.) this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 170 days in filing the above appeal.2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. thelearned counsel appearing for the respondents objected to condone the delay. 3.being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal for admission in the usual course. registry isalso directed to print the name of respondent at the time of admission. [g.k.i.,j] & [r.p.,j] 02.02.2026 aav 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

CMP(MD) No.20448 of 2025 in CMA(MD) Sr.No.93602 of 2025

G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.

AND

R. POORNIMA,J.

(Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 170 days in filing the above appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The

learned counsel appearing for the respondents objected to condone the delay. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.

4. Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in

order and post the appeal for admission in the usual course. Registry is

also directed to print the name of respondent at the time of admission. [G.K.I.,J] & [R.P.,J] 02.02.2026 aav 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties The Managing Director vs Raman Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan,Honourable Ms.Justic...

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales