Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sonu vs State of Kerala

SONU vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 31, 2021
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1679042

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/4379/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SONU

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....files of judicial first class magistrate-ii, kollam and the offences alleged against the petitioners are under sections 143, 147, 294(b), 341, 427, 354 and 509 r/w section 149 of the indian penal code.2. the allegation is that on 05.09.2017, the defactocomplainant returned from the venue after the accused got into trouble during the onam celebrations, was stopped on the way and outraged the modesty of the defacto complainant and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.3. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned public prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for the third respondent.4. it is submitted by respective counsel that thepetitioners and the third respondent have arrived at an amicable settlement and annexure a2 is the affidavit filed. the affidavit, inter alia, states that all the disputes are settled and that the pendency of criminal proceeding would cause hardship to all the parties.5. from the submission across the bar and perusingthe criminal m.c. and the affidavit referred above, i am satisfied that there has been an amicable settlement and that there is no vitiating circumstances in the respondent filing the affidavit. no purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings in the above circumstances.6. in view of the judgment of the hon'ble supreme court in gian singh v. state of punjab and another [2012(10) scc 303] and considering the facts and circumstances ofthe case and in exercise of power of this court under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, i hereby quash annexure ai final report and all further proceedings in crime no.2078/2017 of eravipuram police station, which is now pending as c.c.no.3515 of 2017 on the files of judicial first class magistrate-ii, kollam against petitioners 1 to 4. the crl.mc is allowed as above. sd/- mohammed nias c.p. judge sma appendix petitioner annexures :- annexure a1 certified coy of the charge sheet/final report dated in c.c.no.3515/2017 dated on 7.11.2017. annexure a2.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 10TH POUSHA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 3515/2017 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, KOLLAM PETITIONERS/ACCUSED :-

1 SONU AGED 28 YEARS S/O. SOMAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT KALAYIL PADINJATATHIL, KUTTIKKADA, KUTTIKADA P.O MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM, PINCODE-691 020. (A1) 2 SUBIN KUMAR AGED 33 YEARS S/O. SOMAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT KALAYIL PANDINJATATHIL, KUTTIKKADA, KUTTIKADA P.O., MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM, PINCODE-691 020 (A2). 3 VISHAKH AGED 29 YEARS S/O. ANILKUMAR, RESIDING AT ANILALAYAM VETTIL, KUTTIKKADA, KUTTIKADA P.O., MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM, PIN CODE-691 020 (A3). 4 AJITH AGED 28 YEARS S/O. GIRESHAN, RESIDING AT MUKKADAYIL VEEDU, MAYYANADU THEKKUMKARA CHERYIL, KUTTIKKADA, KUTTIKADA P.O., MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM, PINCODE-691 020. (A4) BY ADV B.DIPU SACH DEEV

RESPONDENTS :- 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PINCODE-682 031. 2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM CITY, KOLLAM, PINCODE-691 011. 3 SANDHYA KUMARI.R AGED 34 YEARS W/O. SURESHBABU, RESIDENT OF RESIDING AT THOOLIKA, KUTTIKKADA, KUTTIKADA P.O., MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM, PINCODE-691 020. BY ADV ARUN BABU SRI.ARAVIND, PP

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The petitioners are accused in Crime No.2078/2017 of Eravipuram Police Station, which is now pending as C.C.No.3515 of 2017 on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kollam and the offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 143, 147, 294(b), 341, 427, 354 and 509 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The allegation is that on 05.09.2017, the defacto

complainant returned from the venue after the accused got into trouble during the onam celebrations, was stopped on the way and outraged the modesty of the defacto complainant and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for the third respondent.

4. It is submitted by respective counsel that the

petitioners and the third respondent have arrived at an amicable settlement and Annexure A2 is the affidavit filed. The affidavit, inter alia, states that all the disputes are settled and that the pendency of criminal proceeding would cause hardship to all the parties.

5. From the submission across the Bar and perusing

the criminal M.C. and the affidavit referred above, I am satisfied that there has been an amicable settlement and that there is no vitiating circumstances in the respondent filing the affidavit. No purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings in the above circumstances.

6. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another [2012

(10) SCC 303] and considering the facts and circumstances of

the case and in exercise of power of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, I hereby quash Annexure AI Final Report and all further proceedings in Crime No.2078/2017 of Eravipuram Police Station, which is now pending as C.C.No.3515 of 2017 on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kollam against petitioners 1 to 4. The Crl.MC is allowed as above. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE SMA APPENDIX PETITIONER ANNEXURES :- Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COY OF THE CHARGE SHEET/FINAL REPORT DATED IN C.C.NO.3515/2017 DATED ON 7.11.2017. Annexure A2 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 23.2.2021.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial