Nain Taj vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jul 31, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1678646

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1678646
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: B M Shyam Prasad
Decided On: Jul 31, 2025
Case Number: WP/8917/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nain Taj

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....chief superintendent central prison mysore-570007. …respondents (by smt. k. p. yashodha, aga ) -2- this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227of the constitution of india praying to direct the respondent 2 to release the petitioner's son waseem pasha @ waseem ctp-17866 on general parole for a period of 90 days citing petitioners illness, the presence of her son is essential to provide physical support at this challenging time as well as to bare all the expenses for medical treatment. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice b m shyam prasadoral orderthe petitioner seeks parole of her son [mr. waseem pasha @ waseen ct-17866] because she has lost her husband in the last 24 hours. mrs. k. p. yashodha, the learned additional government advocate, is called upon to secure instructions for disposal of the petition. the learned additional government advocate submits, on instructions, that indeed the petitioner has lost her husband in the last 24 hours. this court opines that circumstances are made out for grant of parole to the petitioner's son but that -3- should be on condition. however, this court must observe that the petition, which is entertained on a limited ground, will not foreclose any other relief that the petitioner's son may be entitled to in law. hence, the following:orderthe petition is allowed directing the second respondent to grant parole to the petitioner's son [mr. waseem pasha @ waseem ctp-17866] for a week effective from today on the condition that he shall mark his attendance everyday with the station house officer between 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. sd/- (b m shyam prasad) judge rb

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8917 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: NAIN TAJ W/O ABDUL JABBAR MOTHER OF WASEEM PASHA @ WASEEM CTP-17866 AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O NO.130 HYDER ALI BLOCK. GOUSIYA NAGAR, C BLOCK, VILLAGE UDAYAGIRI MYSORE KARNATAKA 570019. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIRAJUDDIN AHMED., ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by
VANAMALA     1.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
N                 HOME DEPARTMENT,
Location:         THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
High Court of VIDHANA SOUDHA, Karnataka BENGALURU-560 001.
2. CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON MYSORE-570007. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K. P. YASHODHA, AGA ) -2- THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT 2 TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER'S SON WASEEM PASHA @ WASEEM CTP-17866 ON GENERAL PAROLE FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS CITING PETITIONERS ILLNESS, THE PRESENCE OF HER SON IS ESSENTIAL TO PROVIDE PHYSICAL SUPPORT AT THIS CHALLENGING TIME AS WELL AS TO BARE ALL THE EXPENSES FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner seeks parole of her son [Mr. Waseem Pasha @ Waseen CT-17866] because she has lost her husband in the last 24 hours. Mrs. K. P. Yashodha, the learned Additional Government Advocate, is called upon to secure instructions for disposal of the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate submits, on instructions, that indeed the petitioner has lost her husband in the last 24 hours. This Court opines that circumstances are made out for grant of parole to the petitioner's son but that -3- should be on condition. However, this Court must observe that the petition, which is entertained on a limited ground, will not foreclose any other relief that the petitioner's son may be entitled to in law. Hence, the following:

ORDER

The petition is allowed directing the second respondent to grant parole to the petitioner's son [Mr. Waseem Pasha @ Waseem CTP-17866] for a week effective from today on the condition that he shall mark his attendance everyday with the Station House Officer between 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2025 Same Parties Nain Taj vs State of Karnataka Same Judge B M Shyam Prasad