Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anandan vs State of Kerala

Anandan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 30, 2021
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1678148

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./7420/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anandan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....litres of wash kept near the wash room of a house bearing no. 52 at madavoor village, in contravention of the provisions of the kerala abkari act. thus, this case has been registered against him.3. the petitioner has been in custody since 09.09.2021.4. the learned public prosecutor has no case that this petitioner is having any criminal antecedents. the records would also reveal that the investigation of the crime has progressed considerably.5. having regard to the period of detention undergone by the petitioner in judicial custody, the quantity of the contraband involved, the present stage of investigation as well the otherfacts and circumstances involved, i am inclined to release him onbail. therefore, this application is allowed subject to the following conditions:(i) the petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing abond for a sum of rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.(ii) the petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required by him, in writing.(iii) the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing suchfacts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with theevidence.(iv) the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.in case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional court is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law. sd/- shircy v. judge sb

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 8TH ASWINA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 7420 OF 2021 CRIME NO.143/2021 OF Chelannur Excise Range Office, Kozhikode AGAINST THE ORDER IN CMP 1866/2021 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -III, KOZHIKODE PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ANANDAN, AGED 65 YEARS S/O.VELUMBAN, R/AT KANNYATT MEETHAL HOUSE, PULLALUR DESOM, MADVOOR VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE TALUK BY ADVS. A.ARUNKUMAR S.SHYAM KUMAR RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE: STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031 SR. PP SMT. SREEJA V THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 30th day of September, 2021 The petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No. 143 of 2021 of Excise Range, Chelannur, registered for the offence punishable under Section 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act has filed this application for his release on bail.

2. The prosecution case is that on 09.09.2021 at about

1.10 p.m., this petitioner was found in possession of 15 litres of wash kept near the wash room of a house bearing No. 52 at Madavoor Village, in contravention of the provisions of the Kerala Abkari Act. Thus, this case has been registered against him.

3. The petitioner has been in custody since 09.09.2021.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor has no case that this petitioner is having any criminal antecedents. The records would also reveal that the investigation of the crime has progressed considerably.

5. Having regard to the period of detention undergone by the petitioner in judicial custody, the quantity of the contraband involved, the present stage of investigation as well the other

facts and circumstances involved, I am inclined to release him on

bail. Therefore, this application is allowed subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a

bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when required by him, in writing.

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such

facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the

evidence.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional court is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law. Sd/- SHIRCY V. JUDGE sb

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial