Venu vs State by

VENU vs State by

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Apr 21, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1677294

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1677294
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: S Vishwajith Shetty
Decided On: Apr 21, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/3744/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

VENU

Respondent

State by

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 21st day of april, 2025 before the hon'ble mr justice s vishwajith shetty criminal petition no. 3744 of 2025 between: venu, s/o yellappa, aged about 27 years, r/at yellampalli village, bagepalli taluk, chikaballapura district - 561 207. …petitioner (by sri a.v. ramakrishna, advocate) and: state by hosakote police - represented by state public prosecutor, high court building, bangalore - 560 001. …respondentdigitally (by smt. pushpalatha b., addl. s.p.p.) signed by nandini ms location: this criminal petition is filed under section 439 high court of of cr.p.c. (filed u/s 483 bnns) praying to grant karnataka regular bail to the petitioner in crime no.210/2024 of hosakote police station for the offences punishable under sections 302 and 309 ipc, pending on the file of vi additional district and sessions judge, bangalore rural, bangalore in s.c.no.308/2024. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:-2- coram: hon'ble mr justice s vishwajith shettyoral orderlearned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for sometime submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to renew his bail application after examination of cws.1, 5, 6 and 7 is completed before the trial court.2. the submission is placed on record.3. accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.4. all contentions urged in this petition are kept open. sd/- (s vishwajith shetty) judge cpn ct: bhk

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3744 OF 2025 BETWEEN: VENU, S/O YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT YELLAMPALLI VILLAGE, BAGEPALLI TALUK, CHIKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 561 207. …PETITIONER (BY SRI A.V. RAMAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE BY HOSAKOTE POLICE - REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT

Digitally (BY SMT. PUSHPALATHA B., ADDL. S.P.P.) signed by NANDINI MS Location: THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 HIGH COURT OF OF CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 483 BNNS) PRAYING TO GRANT KARNATAKA REGULAR BAIL TO THE PETITIONER IN CRIME NO.210/2024 OF HOSAKOTE POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 302 AND 309 IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL, BANGALORE IN S.C.NO.308/2024. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

-2- CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

ORAL ORDER

Learned Counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for sometime submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to renew his bail application after examination of CWs.1, 5, 6 and 7 is completed before the Trial Court.

2. The submission is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.

4. All contentions urged in this petition are kept open. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE CPN CT: BHK

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2025 Same Parties VENU vs State by Same Judge S Vishwajith Shetty