Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mr C P Prashanth vs Savitha

Mr C P Prashanth vs Savitha

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Oct 31, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1674792

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA/4784/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr C P Prashanth

Respondent

Savitha

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 31st day of october, 2025 present the hon'ble mr. justice jayant banerji and the hon'ble mr. justice k. v. aravind miscellaneous first appeal no. 4784 of 2021 (mc) between:1. mr. c. p. prashanth,aged about 40 years, son of c. s. prasanna residing at accounts officer, baruka power corporation limited, talakadu, t. narsipura. …appellant (by smt. sindhu v., advocate) and:digitally signed 1. savitha by valli d/o j. d. jayapala, marimuthu w/o prashanth, location: high aged about 32 years,court of karnataka r/at no. 289, 1st division, 4th ward, kote bidi, gundlupet town. …respondent (respondent served & unrepresented) this mfa filed under section 28(1) of hindu marriage act, 1956, against the judgment and decree dated 04.02.2021 passed in mc no.45/2017 on the file of the senior civil judge and jmfc, gundlupet, allowing the petition filed u/s.9 of hindu marriage act. -2- this appeal, coming on for orders this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice jayant banerji andhon'ble mr. justice k. v. aravindoral judgment(per: hon'ble mr. justice jayant banerji) a memo for withdrawal has been filed on the ground that the parties have settled their differences, and in accordance with the compromise entered into, the application under section 13(b) of the hindu marriage act, 1955 was allowed and decree was accordingly made. the appeal is, therefore, dismissed. in view of dismissal of main appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. (jayant banerji) (k. v. aravind) mv, list no.: 1 sl no.: 18

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No. 4784 OF 2021 (MC) BETWEEN:

1. MR. C. P. PRASHANTH,

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SON OF C. S. PRASANNA RESIDING AT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, BARUKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED, TALAKADU, T. NARSIPURA. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. SINDHU V., ADVOCATE) AND:

Digitally signed   1.    SAVITHA
by VALLI                 D/O J. D. JAYAPALA,
MARIMUTHU                W/O PRASHANTH,
Location: HIGH           AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

COURT OF KARNATAKA R/AT No. 289, 1ST DIVISION, 4TH WARD, KOTE BIDI, GUNDLUPET TOWN. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS MFA FILED UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1956, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.02.2021 PASSED IN MC No.45/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLUPET, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.9 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT. -2- THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) A memo for withdrawal has been filed on the ground that the parties have settled their differences, and in accordance with the compromise entered into, the application under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was allowed and decree was accordingly made. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. In view of dismissal of main appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JAYANT BANERJI) (K. V. ARAVIND) MV, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial