Narendra Kumar Malik vs the State by

Narendra Kumar Malik vs The State by

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jan 31, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1671903

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1671903
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: V Srishananda
Decided On: Jan 31, 2025
Case Number: CRL.A/429/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narendra Kumar Malik

Respondent

The State by

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 31st day of january, 2025 before the hon'ble mr justice v srishananda criminal appeal no.429 of 2012 (c) between:1. narendra kumar malikaged about 67 years s/o late sant lal r/of no.bungalow-7 ganga estate, chembur, mumbai 400 071 maharashtra, kundalal halli …appellant (by sri praveen c, advocate) and:1. the state bycbi, bangalore …respondent (by sri p prasanna kumar, advocate) digitally signed by malatesh this crl.a is filed under section 374(2) cr.p.c kc praying to set aside the order dated 26.03.2012 location: passed by the xxi addl. city civil and s.j. and spl. high court of judge for cbi cases, bangalore in spl.c.c.no.21/1993karnataka convicting the appellant/accused for the offence p/u/s 120-b of ipc. this appeal, coming on for hearing, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice v srishananda -2-oral ordermemo filed, which reads as under: “the undersigned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant most respectfully submits: the counsel prays this hon’ble court to dismiss the appeal as abetted (abetted) as the demise of the appellant was intimated by the son of appellant. hence this memo”. in view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as abated. sd/- (v srishananda) judge kcm list no.: 1 sl no.: 0

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.429 OF 2012 (C) BETWEEN:
1. NARENDRA KUMAR MALIK
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O LATE SANT LAL R/OF NO.BUNGALOW-7 GANGA ESTATE, CHEMBUR, MUMBAI 400 071 MAHARASHTRA, KUNDALAL HALLI …APPELLANT (BY SRI PRAVEEN C, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE BY

CBI, BANGALORE …RESPONDENT (BY SRI P PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by MALATESH THIS CRL.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2) CR.P.C KC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 26.03.2012 Location: PASSED BY THE XXI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND S.J. AND SPL. HIGH COURT OF JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, BANGALORE IN SPL.C.C.NO.21/1993KARNATAKA CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 120-B OF IPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA -2-

ORAL ORDER

Memo filed, which reads as under: “The undersigned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant most respectfully submits: The counsel prays this Hon’ble Court to dismiss the appeal as abetted (ABETTED) as the demise of the appellant was intimated by the son of appellant. Hence this memo”. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as abated. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Narendra Kumar Malik vs The State by Same Judge V Srishananda