Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jayanthi vs Kerala State Vanitha Vikasana Corporation

Jayanthi vs Kerala State Vanitha Vikasana Corporation

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 29, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1671663

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/4814/2013

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jayanthi

Respondent

Kerala State Vanitha Vikasana Corporation

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c. jayachandran friday, the 29th day of october 2021 / 7th karthika, 1943 wp(c) no. 4814 of 2013 petitioner: jayanthi, aged 38 years, puthenveettil, elamakkara p.o., ernakulam - 682026 sri.p.babu kumar sri.p.yadhu kumar respondents: 1 kerala state vanitha vikasana corporation, opp.saritha theatre, banarji road, kochi- 682 018.. 2 regional manager, vanitha vikasana corporation, opp.saritha theatre, banarji road, kochi- 682 018. 3 the thahsildar taluk office, meenachil, kottayam - 686 575 jayasree manoj n.manoj kumar shri.sunil v.mohammed, sc, kswdc other present: smt.latha anand, sc, kswdc this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 29.10.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 29th day of october, 2021 when t his mat terwas t aken up f orconsi der ati on t oday,t her eisnor epr esent ati onf ort iti . learned counsel f or t s submi tted t hat t he ent ire amountdueon accountoft hel oan avai led byt iti hasbeenr ecei vedbyt her sandt her efor e,t her eis nonecessi ty,what soever ,topur sueext ices, whi ch ar esoughtt obequashed byvi rtueoft hei nst antwr it pet iti on.2. the above submissi onsoft he l earned counself or t sisr ecor ded and t swi llst and di rect ed not t otake any act ion agai nst t he pet iti ,in pur suanceofext ices. thi swr itpet iti oni scl osedaccor dingl y. sd/ - c. jayachandran judge nr/ 29/ 10/ appendix petitioner's exhibits ext.p1 true copy of the judgment in w.p.(c) no.22785/2006 of the hon'ble high court of kerala dated 24.8.2006 ext.p2 true photocopy of the payment receipt issued by the 1st respondent to the petitioner dated 23.9.2006. ext.p3 true copy of the notice issued by the 1st respondent to the petitioner dated 22.8.2012 ext.p4 true photocopy of the dated notice issued by the 3rd respondent to the surety dated 20.11.2012.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 4814 OF 2013 PETITIONER: JAYANTHI, AGED 38 YEARS, PUTHENVEETTIL, ELAMAKKARA P.O., ERNAKULAM - 682026 SRI.P.BABU KUMAR SRI.P.YADHU KUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1 KERALA STATE VANITHA VIKASANA CORPORATION, OPP.SARITHA THEATRE, BANARJI ROAD, KOCHI- 682 018.. 2 REGIONAL MANAGER, VANITHA VIKASANA CORPORATION, OPP.SARITHA THEATRE, BANARJI ROAD, KOCHI- 682 018. 3 THE THAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, MEENACHIL, KOTTAYAM - 686 575 JAYASREE MANOJ N.MANOJ KUMAR SHRI.SUNIL V.MOHAMMED, SC, KSWDC OTHER PRESENT: SMT.LATHA ANAND, SC, KSWDC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 29th day of October, 2021 When t his mat terwas t aken up f orconsi der ati on t oday,t her eisnor epr esent ati onf ort iti . Learned counsel f or t s submi tted t hat t he ent ire amountdueon accountoft hel oan avai led byt iti hasbeenr ecei vedbyt her sandt her efor e,t her eis nonecessi ty,what soever ,topur sueExt ices, whi ch ar esoughtt obequashed byvi rtueoft hei nst antwr it pet iti on.

2. The above submi

ssi onsoft he l earned counself or t sisr ecor ded and t swi llst and di rect ed not t otake any act ion agai nst t he pet iti ,in pur suanceofExt ices. Thi swr itpet iti oni scl osedaccor dingl y. Sd/ - C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE NR/ 29/ 10/ APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.22785/2006 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 24.8.2006 EXT.P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 23.9.2006. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 22.8.2012 EXT.P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE DATED NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE SURETY DATED 20.11.2012.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial