Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Kaliamurthy Vs Vembu

Kaliamurthy vs Vembu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 02, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1671096

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP(MD)/12/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kaliamurthy

Respondent

Vembu

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 02.03.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice v.lakshminarayanan and c.m.p.(md)no.113 of 2023 1.kaliyamoorthy 2.subramanian 3.sudha 4.minor paruthiharish 5.minor harsith roshan ... petitioners (minor petitioners 4 and 5 are represented by their mother and natural guardian, the 3rd respondent herein)-vs.- 1.vembu 2.baskar 3.rajasekaran chandrasekaran (died) 4.balasubramanian 5.rajendran 6.ramachandran 7.rani 8.vijaya 9.indhra 10.renuka 11.kala 12.anand 13.the district registrar, dr.moorthy road, o/o.district registrar, 14.the joint sub registrar no.1, bakthapuri street, 15.tamil nadu government, represented by the district collector, o/o.collectorate, thanjavur district. ...respondents prayer: civil revision petition is filed under article 227 of constitution of india to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in i.a.no.891 of 2019 in o.s.no.99 of 2014, dated 17.08.2022 on the file of the principal district munsif court, kumbakonam. for petitioners :no appearance for r1 :mr.r.prakash for r2 to r11 :mr.g.gomathi sankar for r13 to r15 :mrs.d.farjana ghoushia special government pleader *****orderlearned counsel for the petitioners had reported no instructions on 09.12.2025 and had filed a memo to that effect. accepting the said memo, this court had ordered notice to the civil revision petitioners. 2.despite service of notice, none represented the petitioners. this shows that they are not interested in continuing with the litigation. hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02.03.2026 internet :yes/no ncc :yes/no index :yes/no cmr to 1.the principal district munsif , kumbakonam. 2.the district registrar, dr.moorthy road, o/o.district registrar, 3.the joint sub registrar no.1, bakthapuri street, 4.the district collector, tamil nadu government, o/o.collectorate, thanjavur district.v.lakshminarayanan, j.cmr 02.03.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and C.M.P.(MD)No.113 of 2023 1.Kaliyamoorthy 2.Subramanian 3.Sudha 4.Minor Paruthiharish 5.Minor Harsith Roshan ... Petitioners (Minor petitioners 4 and 5 are represented by their Mother and natural guardian, the 3rd respondent herein)

-vs.- 1.Vembu 2.Baskar 3.Rajasekaran Chandrasekaran (Died) 4.Balasubramanian 5.Rajendran 6.Ramachandran 7.Rani 8.Vijaya 9.Indhra 10.Renuka 11.Kala 12.Anand 13.The District Registrar, Dr.Moorthy Road, O/o.District Registrar, 14.The Joint Sub Registrar No.1, Bakthapuri Street, 15.Tamil Nadu Government, represented by the District Collector, O/o.Collectorate, Thanjavur District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.891 of 2019 in O.S.No.99 of 2014, dated 17.08.2022 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kumbakonam. For Petitioners :No appearance For R1 :Mr.R.Prakash For R2 to R11 :Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar For R13 to R15 :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader *****

ORDER

Learned Counsel for the petitioners had reported no instructions on 09.12.2025 and had filed a memo to that effect. Accepting the said memo, this Court had ordered notice to the Civil Revision Petitioners. 2.Despite service of notice, none represented the petitioners. This shows that they are not interested in continuing with the litigation. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02.03.2026 Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No cmr To 1.The Principal District Munsif , Kumbakonam. 2.The District Registrar, Dr.Moorthy Road, O/o.District Registrar, 3.The Joint Sub Registrar No.1, Bakthapuri Street, 4.The District Collector, Tamil Nadu Government, O/o.Collectorate, Thanjavur District.

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

cmr 02.03.2026

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Kaliamurthy vs Vembu Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice V. Lakshminarayanan

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales