Branch Manager Vs Aarayi

Branch Manager vs Aarayi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 02, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1670038

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1670038
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh,Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal
Decided On: Mar 02, 2026
Case Number: CMP(MD)/15288/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Branch Manager

Respondent

Aarayi

Excerpt

cmp(md) no. 15288 of 2025 before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 02-03-2026coramthe honourable mr justice n. anand venkatesh and the honourable mr. justice p.dhanabal cmp(md) no. 15288 of 2025 in cma(md) sr no. 72274 of 20251. branch manager the united india insurance company limited lic divisional office building jeevan prakash gandhiji road thanjavur. petitioner(s) vs1. aarayi w/o. late. raju2. gopal melaline thanjavur district.3. punniyamoorthi4. sivagami w/o. late. ayulu5. kamatchi d/o. late. raju w/o. raja no.14/20 anna nagar durgalaya road thiruvarur district.6. sakthivel s/o. palaniappan no.29/27-d thiruvalluvr nagar punjai pugalur velayudhampalayam manmangalam taluk karur district. respondent(s) for petitioner(s): mr.i.suthakaran for respondent(s): m/s.r.rajamohan for r1 to r5prayer:to condone the delay of 53 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 04.04.2025 passed in mcop no.62 of 2025 on the file of motor accidents claims tribunal, special district judge, thanjavur.order(order of the court was made by n.anand venkatesh j.) this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 53 days in filing the civil miscellaneous appeal.2. notice was ordered on all the respondents on 25.09.2025.3. r1 to r5 are represented through counsel. notice sent to r6 was returned. even theprivate notice sent to r6 has been returned. r6 did not contest the case before the tribunal and was also set exparte. therefore, we are inclined to dispense with notice insofar as r6 is concerned. 4.considering the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is allowed and the delay is condoned. (n.anand venkatesh j.) (p.dhanabal j.) 02-03-2026 rr

Full Judgment

CMP(MD) NO. 15288 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02-03-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CMP(MD) NO. 15288 of 2025 IN CMA(MD) SR NO. 72274 OF 2025
1. Branch Manager The United India Insurance Company Limited LIC Divisional Office Building Jeevan Prakash Gandhiji Road Thanjavur. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. Aarayi W/o. Late. Raju
2. Gopal Melaline Thanjavur District.
3. Punniyamoorthi
4. Sivagami W/o. Late. Ayulu
5. Kamatchi D/o. Late. Raju W/o. Raja No.14/20 Anna Nagar Durgalaya Road Thiruvarur District.
6. Sakthivel S/o. Palaniappan No.29/27-D Thiruvalluvr Nagar Punjai Pugalur Velayudhampalayam Manmangalam Taluk Karur District. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.I.Suthakaran For Respondent(s): M/s.R.Rajamohan For R1 To R5
Prayer:To Condone the delay of 53 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 04.04.2025 passed in MCOP No.62 of 2025 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special District Judge, Thanjavur.

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.Anand Venkatesh J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 53 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. Notice was ordered on all the respondents on 25.09.2025.

3. R1 to R5 are represented through counsel. Notice sent to R6 was returned. Even the

private notice sent to R6 has been returned. R6 did not contest the case before the tribunal and was also set exparte. Therefore, we are inclined to dispense with notice insofar as R6 is concerned. 4.Considering the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is allowed and the delay is condoned. (N.ANAND VENKATESH J.) (P.DHANABAL J.) 02-03-2026 RR

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Branch Manager vs Aarayi Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh,Honourable Mr. Justi...