Vadivel vs Nagarajan,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 23, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1669442

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1669442
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
Decided On: Jun 23, 2026
Case Number: SA(MD)/682/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vadivel

Respondent

Nagarajan,

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated : 21.04.2023coram:the honourable mr.justice abdul quddhose 1.vadivel 2.ganesan .... appellants/appellants/plaintiffs vs. nagarajan ... respondent/respondent/defendant prayer : second appeal is filed under section 100 of code of civil procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 04.07.2019 passed in a.s.no.94 of 2017 on the file of the subordinate judge, aranthangi confirming the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2015 passed in o.s.no.9 of 2012on the file of the district munsif court, aranthangi.for appellants : no appearance for respondent : mr.n.tamilmanijudgmentthe matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today. the matter is listed before me for the 3rd time. the matter is listed before me on 16.03.2023 and on that date, both the learned counsels were not ready and they sought for a short accommodation to argue the matter. theresfter, the matter was adjourned to 13.04.2023 and on that date, there was no representation on the side of the appellants. the learned counsel for therespondent was present and he was ready to argue the matter. since there was representation on the side of the appellants on 13.04.2023, this court directed the registry to post the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 21.04.2023. even today, there is no representation on the side of the appellants and this second appeal is of the year 2021. it can now be inferred that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting this second appeal. accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs.index : yes/no internet: yes/no cm to, 1.the subordinate judge, aranthangi2. the district munsif court, aranthangi. 3.the section officer, vr section, madurai bench of madras high court, madurai.abdul quddhose, j.cm

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1.Vadivel 2.Ganesan .... Appellants/Appellants/Plaintiffs Vs. Nagarajan ... Respondent/Respondent/Defendant Prayer : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 04.07.2019 passed in A.S.No.94 of 2017 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Aranthangi confirming the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2015 passed in O.S.No.9 of 2012on the file of the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.N.Tamilmani

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today. The matter is listed before me for the 3rd time. The matter is listed before me on 16.03.2023 and on that date, both the learned counsels were not ready and they sought for a short accommodation to argue the matter. Theresfter, the matter was adjourned to 13.04.2023 and on that date, there was no representation on the side of the appellants. The learned counsel for the

respondent was present and he was ready to argue the matter. Since there was representation on the side of the appellants on 13.04.2023, this Court directed the Registry to post the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 21.04.2023. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the appellants and this Second Appeal is of the year 2021. It can now be inferred that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting this Second Appeal. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No CM To, 1.The Subordinate Judge, Aranthangi

2. The District Munsif Court, Aranthangi. 3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Vadivel vs Nagarajan, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji