Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Divisional Manager Vs Ananthi

The Divisional Manager vs Ananthi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 02, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1668761

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP(MD)/16309/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Divisional Manager

Respondent

Ananthi

Excerpt

cmp(md) no. 16309 of 2025 before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 02-03-2026coramthe honourable mr justice n. anand venkatesh and the honourable mr. justice p.dhanabal cmp(md) no. 16309 of 2025 in cma(md) sr no. 20235 of 20251. the divisional manager cholamandalam m/s general insurance company limited tab complex cantonment trichirapalli. petitioner(s) vs1. ananthi w/o. anthoni stanley santhanam no.1/91 keelatheru ganthiar theru serumangalam post manargudi taluk thriuvarur district.2. minor deeptha sharon d/o. anthoni stanley santhanam3. minor suganth aalan s/o. anthoni stanley santhanam4. c.vigneshwaran s/o. chellakutty old no.162-1 therku theru reghunathapuram karambakudi taluk pudukkottai district. respondent(s) for petitioner(s): mrd.k.r.shivashankarprayer:to condone the delay of 58 days in filing the above appeal against the award dated 29.11.2024 made in mcop no.448 of 2023 on the file of the motor accident claims tribunal (special sub court) thanjavur.order(order of the court was made by n.anand venkatesh j.) this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 58 days in filing the civil miscellaneous appeal.2. notice was ordered on all the respondents on 13.10.2025. notice has been servedand the names of all the respondents were printed in the cause list. r2 and r3 are minors and they are represented by their mother/r1. none appears for the respondents. 3.considering the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is allowed and the delay is condoned. (n.anand venkatesh j.) (p.dhanabal j.) 02-03-2026 rr

Full Judgment

CMP(MD) NO. 16309 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02-03-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CMP(MD) NO. 16309 of 2025 IN CMA(MD) SR NO. 20235 OF 2025

1. The Divisional Manager Cholamandalam M/s General Insurance Company Limited Tab Complex Cantonment Trichirapalli. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. Ananthi W/o. Anthoni Stanley Santhanam No.1/91 Keelatheru Ganthiar Theru Serumangalam post Manargudi Taluk Thriuvarur District.

2. Minor Deeptha Sharon D/o. Anthoni Stanley Santhanam

3. Minor Suganth Aalan S/o. Anthoni Stanley Santhanam

4. C.Vigneshwaran S/o. Chellakutty Old No.162-1 Therku Theru Reghunathapuram Karambakudi Taluk Pudukkottai District. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mrd.K.R.Shivashankar

Prayer:To condone the delay of 58 days in filing the above appeal against the Award dated 29.11.2024 made in MCOP No.448 of 2023 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Sub Court) Thanjavur.

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.Anand Venkatesh J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 58 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. Notice was ordered on all the respondents on 13.10.2025. Notice has been served

and the names of all the respondents were printed in the cause list. R2 and R3 are minors and they are represented by their Mother/R1. None appears for the respondents. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is allowed and the delay is condoned. (N.ANAND VENKATESH J.) (P.DHANABAL J.) 02-03-2026 RR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial