Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Subbulakshmi vs the Sub Collector,

Subbulakshmi vs The Sub Collector,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1668344

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/22803/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subbulakshmi

Respondent

The Sub Collector,

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated : 30.01.2026coram:the honourable mr.justice k.surender and w.m.p.(md)no.20676 of 2018 subbulakshmi ... petitioner -vs- 3.ramasamy ... respondents prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to theorder in pa.mu.(b2)/2465/2017 dated 10.10.2018, on the file of the firstrespondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent to restore patta no.1015, issued by the second respondent. for petitioner : mr.y.prakash for r1 and r2 : mr.d.sadiq raja additional government pleaderordertoday, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought in the present writ petition has become infructuous and sought permission from this court to withdraw the writ petition. he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. in view of the aforesaid submission and the endorsement made by thelearned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. ncc : yes / no (k.surender, j.) index : yes / no 30.01.2026 to:-k.surender, j.30.01.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.01.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER and W.M.P.(MD)No.20676 of 2018 Subbulakshmi ... Petitioner -vs- 3.Ramasamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the

order in Pa.Mu.(B2)/2465/2017 dated 10.10.2018, on the file of the first

respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent to restore Patta No.1015, issued by the second respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.Y.Prakash For R1 and R2 : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous and sought permission from this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission and the endorsement made by the

learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No 30.01.2026 To:-

K.SURENDER, J.

30.01.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial