Lokesh vs Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 30, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1667734

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1667734
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Suraj Govindaraj
Decided On: Jun 30, 2025
Case Number: WP/48359/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lokesh

Respondent

Commissioner

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 30th day of june, 2025 before the hon'ble mr justice suraj govindaraj writ petition no. 48359 of 2017 (gm-cc) between: lokesh s/o vyarmudi naik aged about 45 years, occupation ex arme police constable r/o no.47, 1st stage, 4th cross gayatripuram, mysore-570001. …petitioner (by sri. praveen kumar raikote., advocate)and: commissioner city corporation, mysore-570001 …respondent (by sri. jagadeesh., advocate ) digitally signed this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 by shwetha raghavendra of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of location: high court of karnataka certiorari and quash the impugned order at annexure-d passed by respondent vide no. hact/80/2015-16-10 dtd19.8.2017 and etc. this writ petition, coming on for preliminary hearing in ‘b’ group, this day, order was made therein as under: -2- coram: hon'ble mr justice suraj govindarajoral order1. the petitioner is before this court seeking for the following reliefs:1. to issue a writ of certiorari and quash the impugnedorder at annexure-d passed by the respondent videno. hacr/80/2015-16/10 dated 19.8.2017.2. any other writ, order or direction that this hon’ble court may be please to issue in the facts and circumstances of the case.2. sri.praveen kumar raikote., learned counsel for thepetitioner submits that the above petition has been rendered infructuous. hence, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/- (suraj govindaraj) judge sr list no.: 1 sl no.: 34

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 48359 OF 2017 (GM-CC) BETWEEN: LOKESH S/O VYARMUDI NAIK AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION EX ARME POLICE CONSTABLE R/O NO.47, 1ST STAGE, 4TH CROSS GAYATRIPURAM, MYSORE-570001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR RAIKOTE., ADVOCATE)

AND: COMMISSIONER CITY CORPORATION, MYSORE-570001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JAGADEESH., ADVOCATE ) Digitally signed THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE-D PASSED BY RESPONDENT VIDE NO. HACT/80/2015-16-10 DTD19.8.2017 AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: -2- CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

ORAL ORDER

1. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

1. To issue a writ of certiorari and quash the impugned

order at Annexure-D passed by the Respondent vide

no. HACR/80/2015-16/10 dated 19.8.2017.

2. Any other writ, order or direction that this Hon’ble Court may be please to issue in the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. Sri.Praveen Kumar Raikote., learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that the above petition has been rendered infructuous. Hence, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Lokesh vs Commissioner Same Judge Suraj Govindaraj