Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Roopesh C K vs the State of Karnataka

Roopesh C K vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Mar 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1667123

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/2556/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Roopesh C K

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....police station, bengaluru. high court of represented by karnataka state public prosecutor, high court building, bengaluru - 01. …respondent (by sri.vinay mahadevaiah., hcgp) this crl.p is filed u/s 439 cr.pc (filed u/s 483 bnns) praying to allow this bail petition, enlarging the petitioner/accused on regular bail in crime no. channammanakere achukattu p.s respondent for the -2- offences punishable under section 8 [c], 22[c], 22 [b] of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 pending on the file xxxiv additional city civil and sessions judge and special judge [ndps] [cch-35] bengaluru. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice s vishwajith shettyoral orderlearned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for some time submits that at this stage the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to approach this court afresh after examination of the material charge sheet witnesses is completed before the trial court. he submits that petitioner who has no other criminal antecedents is in custody from 21.05.2024, and therefore, the trial court may be directed to examine the material charge sheet witnesses on priority.2. the aforesaid submission is placed on record. petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. -3-3. it is needless to state that efforts shall be madeby the prosecution as well as by the trial court to examine the charge sheet witnesses before the trial court on priority. sd/- (s vishwajith shetty) judge kvr list no.: 1 sl no.: 48

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2556 OF 2025 BETWEEN: ROOPESH C K, S/O KRISHNAMURTHY C N, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/A. NO.4 NARAYNAPPAS LAND, CHIYANDAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAGONDAHALLI POST, AVANI HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 127. PRESENTLY IN CENTRAL PRISON. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.SARAVANA.S., ADVOCATE FOR SMT.BHAVYA N G., ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, Digitally signed by BY CHANNAMANNAKERE ACHUKATTU NANDINI MS Location: POLICE STATION, BENGALURU. HIGH COURT OF REPRESENTED BY KARNATAKA STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 01. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.VINAY MAHADEVAIAH., HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNNS) PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS BAIL PETITION, ENLARGING THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED ON REGULAR BAIL IN CRIME NO. CHANNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU P.S RESPONDENT FOR THE -2- OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 8 [C], 22[C], 22 [B] OF NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT 1985 PENDING ON THE FILE XXXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE [NDPS] [CCH-35] BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

ORAL ORDER

Learned Counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for some time submits that at this stage the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court afresh after examination of the material charge sheet witnesses is completed before the Trial Court. He submits that petitioner who has no other criminal antecedents is in custody from 21.05.2024, and therefore, the Trial Court may be directed to examine the material charge sheet witnesses on priority.

2. The aforesaid submission is placed on record. Petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. -3-

3. It is needless to state that efforts shall be made

by the prosecution as well as by the Trial Court to examine the charge sheet witnesses before the Trial Court on priority. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial