N Devaraju vs B N Nataraj

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Mar 28, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1666874

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1666874
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: M.I.Arun
Decided On: Mar 28, 2025
Case Number: WP/34613/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N Devaraju

Respondent

B N Nataraj

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 28th day of march, 2025 before the hon'ble mr justice m.i.arun writ petition no. 34613 of 2018 (gm-cpc) between:1. n. devaraju aged about 62 years s/o late b.s. nagendrappa door no.2233 basaveshwara main road k.r. mohalla, mysuru-570 024. …petitioner (by sri. prabhugouda b.t., advocate [absent]) and:1. b.n. natarajaged about 64 years late b.s. nagendrappa digitally door no.1207 signed by h v.v. road, k.r. mohalla k hema location: high court of 2. smt. sowbhagya karnataka aged about 61 years w/o c. nagaraj door no.1473 shivarampet3. smt. dakshayani aged about 59 years w/o chandrashekar, no.mig.32, devi medicals opp: r.m.p. medicals 3rd stage, kuvempu nagar -2-…respondents (by sri. mohan b.k. & ashwath c.m., advocates for r.1; r.2: served.) this petition is filed under article 227 of the constitution of india, praying to quash the impugnedorder passed by the hon'ble judge, principal court ofsmall causes, mysuru, in fdp.no.1/2006 dated 25.07.2016 produced wide annexure-a to the writ petition, in the interest of justice and equity. this petition coming on for orders, throughphysical hearing/video conferencing, this day, orderwas made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr justice m.i.arunoral ordernone appears for the petitioner.2. on 06.01.2025, the following order was passed:"one week time is granted for doing the needful. by that time, if the needful is not done, writ petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the court." -3-3. needful has not been done as on today. it appearsthat the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- (m.i.arun) judge pgg list no.: 1 sl no.: 6

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 34613 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. N. DEVARAJU AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE B.S. NAGENDRAPPA DOOR NO.2233 BASAVESHWARA MAIN ROAD K.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU-570 024. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRABHUGOUDA B.T., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
1. B.N. NATARAJ

AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS LATE B.S. NAGENDRAPPA Digitally DOOR NO.1207 signed by H V.V. ROAD, K.R. MOHALLA K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF 2. SMT. SOWBHAGYA KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS W/O C. NAGARAJ DOOR NO.1473 SHIVARAMPET

3. SMT. DAKSHAYANI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS W/O CHANDRASHEKAR, NO.MIG.32, DEVI MEDICALS OPP: R.M.P. MEDICALS 3RD STAGE, KUVEMPU NAGAR -2-

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAN B.K. & ASHWATH C.M., ADVOCATES FOR R.1; R.2: SERVED.) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED

ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE JUDGE, PRINCIPAL COURT OF

SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU, IN FDP.NO.1/2006 DATED 25.07.2016 PRODUCED WIDE ANNEXURE-A TO THE WRIT PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH

PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

ORAL ORDER

None appears for the petitioner.

2. On 06.01.2025, the following order was passed:

"One week time is granted for doing the needful. By that time, if the needful is not done, writ petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court." -3-

3. Needful has not been done as on today. It appears

that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties N Devaraju vs B N Nataraj Same Judge M.I.Arun