Sri. S. Vasanth Kumar vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. S. Vasanth Kumar vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jun 27, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1666645

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1666645
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: E.S.Indiresh
Decided On: Jun 27, 2025
Case Number: WP/5947/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri. S. Vasanth Kumar

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....(by sri. siddharth baburao, aga ) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to direct the respondents to consider the representations dated 06.06.2006 and 30.01.2025 -2- given by the petitioner by continuing the rtc in the name of the petitioner with respect to property bearing sy no. 28, measuring 02 acre, situated at chikkagattiganabbe village, kasaba hobli, hosakote taluk, bengaluru rural district, i.e., annexure-'a' and 'a1' by allowing the above writ petition. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice e.s.indireshoral order1. sri. siddharth baburao, learned additional government advocate accepts notice for the respondents.2. heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.3. in this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is withregard to non consideration of his representations dated 06.06.2006 and 30.01.2025 (annexures - a & a1), whereby the petitioner has sought for continuation of rtc in the name of the petitioner, in respect of the subject land.4. in that view of the matter, without expressing anyopinion on the merits of the case, respondent no.2 is directed -3- to verify the records and take decision in the matter in respect of the representations produced at annexures - a & a1, dated 06.06.2006 and 30.01.2025 respectively, in accordance with law, within outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.5. accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed. sd/- (e.s.indiresh) judge sac list no.: 1 sl no.: 34

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.5947 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. S. VASANTH KUMAR SON OF SUBBARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKAGATTIGANABBE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KRISHNA MURTHY T.R., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVNUE Digitally signed by VIDHANA SOUDHA SHARMA ANAND CHAYA BENGALURU -560001. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. THE TAHSILDAR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 06.06.2006 AND 30.01.2025 -2- GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER BY CONTINUING THE RTC IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO PROPERTY BEARING SY NO. 28, MEASURING 02 ACRE, SITUATED AT CHIKKAGATTIGANABBE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, I.E., ANNEXURE-'A' AND 'A1' BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

1. Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is with

regard to non consideration of his representations dated 06.06.2006 and 30.01.2025 (Annexures - A & A1), whereby the petitioner has sought for continuation of RTC in the name of the petitioner, in respect of the subject land.

4. In that view of the matter, without expressing any

opinion on the merits of the case, respondent No.2 is directed -3- to verify the records and take decision in the matter in respect of the representations produced at Annexures - A & A1, dated 06.06.2006 and 30.01.2025 respectively, in accordance with law, within outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2025 Same Parties Sri. S. Vasanth Kumar vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge E.S.Indiresh