Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

E.P. Preetha vs Union of India

E.P. Preetha vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Nov 24, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1665424

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/1616/2011

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

E.P. Preetha

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan wednesday, the 24th day of november 2021 / 3rd agrahayana, wp(c) no. 1616 of 2011 petitioner/s: e.p. preetha d/o. parameswaran, ezhikode mana, house no.23/1,, kannancherry, kallai p.o., calicut-673 003. by adv sri.grashious kuriakose respondent/s: 1 union of india ministry of railways, new delhi-1. 2 the railway board rep. by its chairman rail bhavan, new delhi. 3 the senior divisional commercial manager, divisional office, southern railways,, palghat. by adv sri.a.dinesh rao, sc, railways this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 24.11.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: -2w.p.(c). no. 1616 of 2011p.v.kunhikrishnan, j.================================================= w.p.(c) no.1616 of 2011 ============================================================= dated this the 24th day of november, 2021judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. the counsel also submitted that, if there is any fresh cause of action arises, the petitioner may be given a liberty to approach this court again. therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach this court, if there is any fresh cause of action arises. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan judge das

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, WP(C) NO. 1616 OF 2011 PETITIONER/S: E.P. PREETHA D/O. PARAMESWARAN, EZHIKODE MANA, HOUSE NO.23/1,, KANNANCHERRY, KALLAI P.O., CALICUT-673 003. BY ADV SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT/S: 1 UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, NEW DELHI-1. 2 THE RAILWAY BOARD REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN RAIL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 3 THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, SOUTHERN RAILWAYS,, PALGHAT. BY ADV SRI.A.DINESH RAO, SC, RAILWAYS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2W.P.(C). No. 1616 of 2011

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

================================================= W.P.(C) No.1616 of 2011 ============================================================= Dated this the 24th day of November, 2021

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. The counsel also submitted that, if there is any fresh cause of action arises, the petitioner may be given a liberty to approach this Court again. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court, if there is any fresh cause of action arises. sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE das

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial