Full Judgment
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI WRIT PETITION NO. 4399 OF 2025 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:
1. MASTER DEV SINHA, S/O HEERA LAL SINHA, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER, SMT DIPALI SINHA, W/O. HEERA LAL SINHA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER, SRI VENKATESH RAO.S, S/O. LATE SRINIVASA RAO.N, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 1813/13, Digitally signed
by NANDINI R B, 23RD CROSS, Location: HIGH NEAR GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, COURT OF VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU NORTH, KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560079…PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESWARA P N, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. CENTRAL BOARD OF REP. BY ITS REGIONAL OFFICER, -2- BENGALURU 560 072.
2. THE REGIONAL OFFICER, CENTRAL BOARD OF BENGALURU - 560 072.
3. GEETHANJALI VIDYALAYA SCHOOL,
KAGGADASAPURA, C. V. RAMAN NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 093. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.R. SHAILENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND 2 R3 SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION ON THE REPRESENTATION CONTAINED IN THE EMAIL DATED 08.02.2025 AT 4.14 P.M. AT ANNEXURE-A; TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 SCHOOL TO ISSUE ADMISSION CARD TO THE PETITIONER.DIRECTION OF APPROPRIATE NATURE TO THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 TO SEIZE ALL THE PRACTICAL RECORDS, PROJECT BOOKS, ASSIGNMENT BOOKS OF THE ENTIRE CLASS 12 STUDENTS OF YEAR 2024-25 STUDYING IN THE 3RD RESPONDENT SCHOOL FORTH WITH AND DIRECTION TO RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 TO ENSURE THAT THE 3RD RESPONDENT DOES NOT REFUSE TO GRANT STUDY
-3- CERTIFICATE AND TRANSFER CERTIFICATE AS AND WHEN REQUIRED BY THE PETITIONER AND SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel Sri Shailendra, appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. In pursuance to the interim order passed by
this Court, the Examination has been conducted and learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits, if the permission is granted, they would release the results.
3. The grievance was that, respondent No.3 was insisting for a payment of an additional sum of Rs.25,000/- from the petitioner and therefore, they had approached this Court. -4-
4. Even after service of notice, respondent No.3
had not appeared before this Court. Therefore, the petition is disposed off, with a direction that respondent No.1 shall publish the results and respondent No.3 is directed to issue Marks Card, Passing certificate etc., as permissible under the Rules of respondent No.1. Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE tsn* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 136