Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Surendra Panicker vs P.B.Subha

Surendra Panicker vs P.B.Subha

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 26, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1664089

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/829/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Surendra Panicker

Respondent

P.B.Subha

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.anil kumar thursday, the 26th day of august 2021 / 4th bhadra, 1943 against the judgment and decree dated 26.9.2016 in as 37/2013 of sub court, chengannur arising from the judgment and decree dated 31.7.2013 in os.324/2009 of munsiff's court, chengannur appellants/appellants/defendants: 1 surendra panicker, aged 72 years, valiyakalayilaya puthenpurayil house, karakkad muri, mulakuzha village, chengannur. 2 raveendra panicker, aged 69 years, valiyakalayilaya puthenpurayil house, karakkad muri, mulakuzha village, chengannur. sri.jomy george sri.deepak mohan smt.anju thomas.m. respondent/respondent/plaintiff: p.b.subha, aged 68 years, w/o.sukumaran, janaki mandiram, peringala muri, mulakkuzha village, chengannur 689106. smt.v.jaya ragi sri.neeraj narayan sri.r.harikrishnan this regular second appeal having come up for admission on 09.08.2021, the court on 26.08.2021 delivered the following: ..2..judgmentthis matter was heard and reserved for judgment/orders on 09.08.2021.2. after having reserved for judgment/orders, thelearned counsel appearing for the appellants in the regular second appeal requested that they are not pressing the matter and they may be permitted to file a not press memo.3. the learned counsel for the appellants by filing a not press memo dated 10.08.2021 submitted that the above regular second appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. the above submission of the learned counsel for the appellants and the memo are recorded. accordingly, the regular second appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- n.anil kumar, judge skj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 4TH BHADRA, 1943 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.9.2016 IN AS 37/2013 OF SUB COURT, CHENGANNUR ARISING FROM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.7.2013 IN OS.324/2009 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHENGANNUR APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 SURENDRA PANICKER, AGED 72 YEARS, VALIYAKALAYILAYA PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, KARAKKAD MURI, MULAKUZHA VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR. 2 RAVEENDRA PANICKER, AGED 69 YEARS, VALIYAKALAYILAYA PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, KARAKKAD MURI, MULAKUZHA VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR. SRI.JOMY GEORGE SRI.DEEPAK MOHAN SMT.ANJU THOMAS.M. RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: P.B.SUBHA, AGED 68 YEARS, W/O.SUKUMARAN, JANAKI MANDIRAM, PERINGALA MURI, MULAKKUZHA VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR 689106. SMT.V.JAYA RAGI SRI.NEERAJ NARAYAN SRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.08.2021, THE COURT ON 26.08.2021 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

This matter was heard and reserved for judgment/orders on 09.08.2021.

2. After having reserved for judgment/orders, the

learned counsel appearing for the appellants in the regular second appeal requested that they are not pressing the matter and they may be permitted to file a not press memo.

3. The learned counsel for the appellants by filing a not press memo dated 10.08.2021 submitted that the above Regular Second Appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. The above submission of the learned counsel for the appellants and the memo are recorded. Accordingly, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- N.ANIL KUMAR, JUDGE skj

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties Surendra Panicker vs P.B.Subha Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice N.Anil Kumar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales