Jayaprakash S vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 15, 2021

~4 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1662932

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1662932
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran
Decided On: Sep 15, 2021
Case Number: WP(C)/16186/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jayaprakash S

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....ogi vehi m cont inuous pol icepr rom anyt hreatori nti rom t hem.3. sri.e. c.bi neesh, l earned government pl eader appear ing f ort heof fici alr s,submi tted t hatpol ice ar ekeepi ng aconst antvi gilon t hel ifeand pr tiesoft he pet iti onerand t hatnoi nfr act ion ofl aw and or derorbr each ofpeacehasbeenyetr epor tedf rom t hepar tofr s 4t o 6. he added t hatpol ice wi llcont inue t o keep a cl ose vi gilandwi llpr otectt hel ifeoft hepet iti oneri nfut ureal so.4. inotice t hateven t hough,ser vice ofnot ices has beencompl etedonr s4t o6,t heyhavechosennot t obepr esentbef oret tort ober epr esent edt hrough counsel ;inf erent ial lygui ding met othei mpr essi on t hey have not hing t o of fer i n answer t othe var ious al legat ions cont ainedi nthi swr itpet iti on. i n t he af ore ci rcumst ances, i al low t his wr it pet iti on and di r he 3rd r ectt espondent -st ati on house of ficer t o af for d adequat e and ef fect ive pol ice pr ion t othe l ife and pr ties of t he pet iti oner ,fr om any t hreat or i nti ion f rom anysour ce,i ncl udi ng r s4 t o 6; and t o ensur ethatl aw and or deri smai ntai ned i nthe ar ea wher ethepet iti oneri sresi ding,wi thoutanybr eachofpeace i nfut ure. needl ess t o say,i fany compl ainti s made by t he pet iti onerwi thr espectt othet hreatori nti acedby hi m f rom r s4 t o 6 ort hei rmen orassoci atesor any ot her per son, same shal l be adver ted t he 3rd o by t r espondentwi tht he ser iousness i tdeser ves and necessar y act ion t aken t her eon, swi ftl y and qui ckl y, wi thout any avoi dabl edel ay. sd/- devan ramachandran judge nr/15/09/2021 appendix of wp(c) 16186/2021 petitioner exhibits: exhibit p1 the true copy of the said commissionreport dated 22.7.2017 filed by said advocate commissioner v hari exhibit p2 the true copy of the complaint by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent dated 27.6.2021 exhibit p3 email complaint dated 14.6.2021 by petitioner to the director general of police.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 24TH BHADRA, WP(C) NO. 16186 OF 2021 PETITIONER: 1 JAYAPRAKASH S AGED 58 YEARS S/O.SADHANANDHAN, PUTHEN VEEDU, KADAKKAL, MANIKANDESWARAM, AYROORKONAM, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 013 BY ADVS. TITTO THOMAS S.VAISAKH R.REVIKUMAR NAVEEN THOMAS RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT ANNEXE, TRIVANDRUM 695 001, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP OFFICE, VAZHUTHAKAD, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 010 3 STATION HOUSE OFFICER PEROORKADA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 005 4 THARA JAYAPRAKASH W/O.JAYAPRAKASH, AGED 49 YEARS, SJ NIVAS, PANAYARA PO, CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, VARKALA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 145 5 GREESHMA D/O.JAYAPRAKASH, SJ NIVAS, PANAYARA PO, CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, VARKALA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 145 6 SHAMEER SJ NIVAS, PANAYARA PO, CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, VARKALA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 145 BY ADV. SRI. E.C. BINEESH, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 15th day of September, 2021 The pet iti onerhasappr oached t tal legi ng t hathe i s bei ng subj ect ed t o const antt s by t he wi fe, daught er and son- in- law- namel y, r s 4 t o 6 r espect ivel y,demandi ngt hathegi vet hem hi spr tiesand weal th. The pet iti onersayst hatwhen t he t sbecome unbear abl e,he pr eferr ed Exhi bit s P2 and P3 r equest sfor pr ion bef oret her s2 and 3 r espect ivel y; but al leges t hat no act ion has been t aken t her eon, t hus const rai ninghi mtohaveappr oachedt tthr ought his wr itpet iti on.

2. Thepet

iti onersayst her ear ecer tai n di sput es bet weent hewi feandhi msel f,whi char enow pendi ngbef ore t heFami lyCour tandal legest hishasi nfur iat edherand r s 5 and 6 t o such ext ent ,thatt hey have made sever alt stohi sli fei nthepast . Hepoi ntsoutt hat ,as i smani festf rom Ext .P1- repor toft heAdvocat eCommi ssi oner appoi nted byt heFami lyCour t,even hewast ened and at tacked byt he par tyr s;and he,t her efor e,pr ays t hePol iceAut hor iti esbedi rect edt ogi vehi m cont inuous Pol icepr rom anyt hreatori nti rom t hem.

3. Sr

i.E. C.Bi neesh, l earned Government Pl eader appear ing f ort heof fici alr s,submi tted t hatPol ice ar ekeepi ng aconst antvi gilon t hel ifeand pr tiesoft he pet iti onerand t hatnoi nfr act ion ofl aw and or derorbr each ofpeacehasbeenyetr epor tedf rom t hepar tofr s 4t o 6. He added t hatPol ice wi llcont inue t o keep a cl ose vi gilandwi llpr otectt hel ifeoft hepet iti oneri nfut ureal so.

4. Inot

ice t hateven t hough,ser vice ofnot ices has beencompl etedonr s4t o6,t heyhavechosennot t obepr esentbef oret tort ober epr esent edt hrough counsel ;inf erent ial lygui ding met othei mpr essi on t hey have not hing t o of fer i n answer t othe var ious al legat ions cont ainedi nthi swr itpet iti on. I n t he af ore ci rcumst ances, I al low t his wr it pet iti on and di r he 3rd r ectt espondent -St ati on House Of ficer t o af for d adequat e and ef fect ive Pol ice pr ion t othe l ife and pr ties of t he pet iti oner ,fr om any t hreat or i nti ion f rom anysour ce,i ncl udi ng r s4 t o 6; and t o ensur ethatl aw and or deri smai ntai ned i nthe ar ea wher ethepet iti oneri sresi ding,wi thoutanybr eachofpeace i nfut ure. Needl ess t o say,i fany compl ainti s made by t he pet iti onerwi thr espectt othet hreatori nti acedby hi m f rom r s4 t o 6 ort hei rmen orassoci atesor any ot her per son, same shal l be adver ted t he 3rd o by t r espondentwi tht he ser iousness i tdeser ves and necessar y act ion t aken t her eon, swi ftl y and qui ckl y, wi thout any avoi dabl edel ay. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE NR/15/09/2021 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16186/2021 PETITIONER EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SAID COMMISSION

REPORT DATED 22.7.2017 FILED BY SAID ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER V HARI EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 27.6.2021 EXHIBIT P3 EMAIL COMPLAINT DATED 14.6.2021 BY PETITIONER TO THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2021 Same Parties Jayaprakash S vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran