Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

V.Latha Vs The Commissioner of Revenue Administration

V.Latha vs The Commissioner of Revenue Administration

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 01, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1662275

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/18253/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.Latha

Respondent

The Commissioner of Revenue Administration

Excerpt

.....filed for issuance of writ of mandamus, forbearing the respondent no.3 from relieving the petitioner from service till the decision is taken by the respondent no.3 regardingalteration of date of birth of the petitioner in pursuance to the orderpassed by this court in w.p.(md)no.9118 of 2026, dated 06.04.2026.3. when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents have already passed an order rejecting the petitioner's request for alteration of his date of birth.4. at this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the proceedings passed by the respondents.5. in the light of the above, this writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings/rejection order passed by the respondents, if so aggrieved, in accordance with law. there shall be no order as to costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 01.07.2026 index :yes / no internet :yes / no ncc :yes / no nsr to: 1.the commissioner of revenue administration, disaster management, chepauk, chennai - 600 005. 2.the tamil university, represented by its convener committee, 3.the tamil university, represented by its registrar,mummineni sudheer kumar, j.nsrorder made in01.07.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P.(MD)No.13509 of 2026 Dr.V.Latha ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. 2.The Tamil University, Represented by its Convener Committee, 3.The Tamil University, Represented by its Registrar, Thanjavur - 613 010. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondent No.3 from relieving the petitioner from service till the decision is taken by the Respondent No.3 regarding alteration of date of birth of the petitioner in pursuance to the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No. 9118 of 2026, dated 06.04.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Aswin Raja Simman For R-1 : Mr.K.Porkodi Government Pleader For R-2 & R-3 : Mr.M.Pozhilan For M/s.Arul Vadivel Associates *****

ORDER

Heard Mr.T.Aswin Raja Simman for the Petitioner, Mr.K.Porkodi, learned Government Pleader for the 1st Respondent and Mr.M.Pozhilan for M/s.Arul Vadivel Associates for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

2. This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondent No.3 from relieving the petitioner from service till the decision is taken by the Respondent No.3 regarding

alteration of date of birth of the petitioner in pursuance to the order

passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.9118 of 2026, dated 06.04.2026.

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents have already passed an order rejecting the petitioner's request for alteration of his date of birth.

4. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the proceedings passed by the respondents.

5. In the light of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as

withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings/rejection order passed by the respondents, if so aggrieved, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 01.07.2026 Index :Yes / No Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No Nsr To: 1.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. 2.The Tamil University, Represented by its Convener Committee, 3.The Tamil University, Represented by its Registrar,

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

Nsr

Order made in

01.07.2026

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties V.Latha vs The Commissioner of Revenue Administration Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales