Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Senthilkumar C Vs The District Collector

Senthilkumar C vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 01, 2026
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1662266

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/18319/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Senthilkumar C

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....the records relating to the impugned notice in na.ka. no.3255/2026/aa1 dated 22.06.2026 issued by the second respondent and quash the same as illegal. for petitioner : mr. n.mohan for r1 to r3 : mr.p.sudarkodi natchiyar counsel for state of tn *****orderthis writ petition is taken up for hearing at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for state of tn for the respondents 1 to 3, after dispensing with the notice for the respondents 4 and 5, as no adverse orders proposed to be passed against the respondents 4 and 5.2. the petitioner had been given permission earlier on 13.01.2026 by the second respondent for drawing water from the government poramboke land to his agricultural land for irrigation purpose. the aforesaid permission also stipulated certain conditions, which reads as under: epge;jidfs;1. rhiyapy; foha; gjpg;g nra;jplk; ngh oj rhiyf;f vt;tpj ghjpg;gk; vw;glj;jf;$lhj.2. gwk;gfy; epyq;fspy; 3 mbf;f fpo; foha; gjpg;g nra;jk;.ghijfsf;f ,ilq;ry; vw;glhky; 3 mb moj;jpy; igg;iyd; mikf;f ntz;lk;. 3 epge;jid kpwpaj fz;lwpag;gbd; ,e;j mdkjp miz vt;tpj kd;dwptpg;gk; ,d;wp ,uj;j nra;ag;glk;. 4 cu; nghjkf;fsplkpue;j ml;nrgiz vjk; tug;ngwpd; ,e;j mdkjp ,uj;j nra;a neuplk;. 5 igg;iyd; mikg;gpy; vt;tpj khw;wkk; nra;af;$lhj.6. igg;iyd; mikf;f cj;njrpj;js;s epykhdj ng&uhl;rpf;f fl;lg;gl;l epykhfk;. ng&uhl;rpf;f fl;lg;gl;ls;sjhy; rk;ke;jg;gl;l jiwaplk; xg;gjy; ngw;w foha; gjpg;g mikj;jf; nfhs;s ntz;baj.7. nkyk; foha; gjpg;g nra;a nghjg;gzpj;jiw> ne lq;rhiyj;jiw kw;wk; rk;ge;jg;gl;l jiwfsplk; mdkjp ngw;w foha; gjpg;g mikj;jf; nfhs;s ntz;baj.8. foha; gjpg;g fj;jif cupkk; fhyk; kbtilak; xu khjj;jpw;f kd;g foha; gjpg;g fj;jif cupkk; gjg;gpj;j toq;f nfhup kdr; nra;a ntz;lk;.3. after the permission was granted, it appears that the private respondenthad given a complaint stating that the water being drawn by the petitioner from the government poramboke land to his agricultural land was resulting in water.....

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.(MD) No.13553 & 13554 of 2026 C.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector, Collectorate,

2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Officer, Palani Taluk,

3. The Divisional Engineer (Construction and Maintenance), Highways Department, Palani,

4. The Executive Engineer, Nanganjiyaaru Irrigation Division, Palani,

5. K.Gunasekaran ... Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned Notice in Na.Ka. No.3255/2026/Aa1 dated 22.06.2026 issued by the second respondent and quash the same as illegal. For petitioner : Mr. N.Mohan For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.Sudarkodi Natchiyar Counsel for State of TN *****

ORDER

This Writ Petition is taken up for hearing at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for State of TN for the respondents 1 to 3, after dispensing with the notice for the respondents 4 and 5, as no adverse orders proposed to be passed against the respondents 4 and 5.

2. The petitioner had been given permission earlier on 13.01.2026 by the second respondent for drawing water from the Government poramboke land to his agricultural land for irrigation purpose. The aforesaid permission also stipulated certain conditions, which reads as under: epge;jidfs;

1. rhiyapy; Foha; gjpg;G nra;jpLk; ngh OJ rhiyf;F vt;tpj ghjpg;Gk; Vw;gLj;jf;$lhJ.

2. Gwk;Gfy; epyq;fspy; 3 mbf;F fPo; Foha; gjpg;G nra;Jk;.

ghijfSf;F ,ilQ;ry; Vw;glhky; 3 mb Moj;jpy; igg;iyd; mikf;f Ntz;Lk;. 3 epge;jid kPwpaJ fz;lwpag;gbd; ,e;j mDkjp Miz vt;tpj Kd;dwptpg;Gk; ,d;wp ,uj;J nra;ag;gLk;. 4 Cu; nghJkf;fsplkpUe;J Ml;Nrgiz vJk; tug;ngwpd; ,e;j mDkjp ,uj;J nra;a NeupLk;. 5 igg;iyd; mikg;gpy; vt;tpj khw;wKk; nra;af;$lhJ.

6. igg;iyd; mikf;f cj;Njrpj;Js;s epykhdJ Ng&uhl;rpf;F fl;Lg;gl;l epykhFk;. Ng&uhl;rpf;F fl;Lg;gl;Ls;sjhy; rk;ke;jg;gl;l Jiwaplk; xg;Gjy; ngw;W Foha; gjpg;G mikj;Jf; nfhs;s Ntz;baJ.

7. NkYk; Foha; gjpg;G nra;a nghJg;gzpj;Jiw> ne LQ;rhiyj;Jiw kw;Wk; rk;ge;jg;gl;l Jiwfsplk; mDkjp ngw;W Foha; gjpg;G mikj;Jf; nfhs;s Ntz;baJ.

8. Foha; gjpg;G Fj;jif cupkk; fhyk; KbtilAk; xU khjj;jpw;F Kd;G Foha; gjpg;G Fj;jif cupkk; GJg;gpj;J toq;f Nfhup kDr; nra;a Ntz;Lk;.

3. After the permission was granted, it appears that the private respondent

had given a complaint stating that the water being drawn by the petitioner from the Government poramboke land to his agricultural land was resulting in water scarcity. Hence, acting on the complaint of the private respondent No.5, the impugned notice has been issued wherein the petitioner has been called upon to appear on 25.06.2026 at 5.00 p.m. with relevant documents. Apprehending an adverse decision, the petitioner has now filed this writ petition to scuttle to hearing fixed by the second respondent.

4. In my view, this writ petition is pre-mature and is, therefore, liable to be

dismissed. Therefore, I direct the petitioner to appear before the second respondent on Monday i.e., 06.07.2026 at 5.00 p.m with necessary documents to substantiate the case of the petitioner. The second respondent shall pass appropriate orders on merits after considering the case of the petitioner as also the fifth respondent herein. Pending such exercise, status quo as on date shall be maintained.

5. This Writ Petition is dismissed, with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes / No 01.07.2026 Internet : Yes / No apd To

1. The District Collector, Collectorate,

2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Officer, Palani Taluk,

3. The Divisional Engineer (Construction and Maintenance), Highways Department, Palani,

C.SARAVANAN, J.

apd 01.07.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial