Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

V.Packirisamy Vs The Management of

V.Packirisamy vs The Management of

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1662028

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/18215/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.Packirisamy

Respondent

The Management of

Excerpt

.....of mandamus directing the respondent to pay the petitioner interest at the rate of 18% per annum for the period of delay from 01.08.2024 to 01.12.2025 in paying the amounts paid towards his terminal benefits, namely, epf employee's contribution, gratuity and encashment of leaves / already surrendered earned leaves within a time frame as may be fixed by this court.for petitioner : mr.s.arunachalam for respondent : mr.s.c.herold singh standing counselordermr.s.c.herold singh, learned standing counsel, takes notice for the respondent - transport corporation.2. with the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.3. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent - transport corporation.4. learned counsel on either side unanimously agree that theissue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by various judgments passed by the division bench of this court in w.a.(md) no.403 of 2010 and batch, dated 30.06.2014 and w.a.(md) no.1419 of 2021 and batch, dated 26.07.2021.5. in the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for thebelated payment of the petitioner's terminal benefits, namely, epf employee's contribution, gratuity and encashment of leaves / already surrendered earned leaves, from the date of his retirement till the date on which those benefits are paid to the petitioner. the respondent is further directed to comply with the said direction as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no costs.ncc : yes / no index : yes / no internet : yes / no krkmummineni sudheer kumar, j.krk

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR V.Packirisamy ... Petitioner -vs- The Management of State Express Transport Corporation (Tamilnadu) Ltd., rep.by its Managing Director Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2 ... Respondent

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to pay the petitioner interest at the rate of 18% per annum for the period of delay from 01.08.2024 to 01.12.2025 in paying the amounts paid towards his terminal benefits, namely, EPF employee's contribution, gratuity and encashment of leaves / already surrendered earned leaves within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For Respondent : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel

ORDER

Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondent - Transport Corporation.

2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent - Transport Corporation.

4. Learned counsel on either side unanimously agree that the

issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by various Judgments passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD) No.403 of 2010 and batch, dated 30.06.2014 and W.A.(MD) No.1419 of 2021 and batch, dated 26.07.2021.

5. In the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the

belated payment of the petitioner's terminal benefits, namely, EPF employee's contribution, gratuity and encashment of leaves / already surrendered earned leaves, from the date of his retirement till the date on which those benefits are paid to the petitioner. The respondent is further directed to comply with the said direction as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

krk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial