Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vinod C vs Divya Bharathi

Vinod C vs Divya Bharathi

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 29, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1661859

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/4693/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinod C

Respondent

Divya Bharathi

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 29th day of july, 2025 before the hon'ble smt. justice lalitha kanneganti writ petition no. 4693 of 2022 (gm-fc) between: vinod c aged 31 years s/o chandrasekaran residing at no.107, vinayakapuram, opp: tneb office, veppankuppam, ambur taluk, vellore - 6321107. …petitioner (by sri. omar shariff, adv.)and: divya bharathi w/o c vinod aged about 29 years digitally signed by megha mohan residing at no 421 location: high court of karnataka ngef layout, 3rd cross, kasthuri nagar, bangalore-560016. …respondent (by sri. kiran sebastian rozario, adv.) this writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to direct the learned family court to set aside the impugnedorder dtd. 12.1.2022 on the file of the learned iiiaddl family court in orders on ia no.3 in mc no.4121/2019 and etc. -2- this petition, coming on for dismissal, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble smt. justice lalitha kannegantioral orderthe memo is filed stating that the matter is settled via mediation in m.c.no.4121/2019 and hence, the petitioner does not want to pursue the matter.2. memo is taken on record.3. accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (lalitha kanneganti) judge ssd list no.: 1 sl no.: 11

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 4693 OF 2022 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: VINOD C AGED 31 YEARS S/O CHANDRASEKARAN RESIDING AT NO.107, VINAYAKAPURAM, OPP: TNEB OFFICE, VEPPANKUPPAM, AMBUR TALUK, VELLORE - 6321107. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. OMAR SHARIFF, ADV.)

AND: DIVYA BHARATHI W/O C VINOD AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN RESIDING AT NO 421 Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA NGEF LAYOUT, 3RD CROSS, KASTHURI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560016. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. KIRAN SEBASTIAN ROZARIO, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE LEARNED FAMILY COURT TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED

ORDER DTD. 12.1.2022 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED III

ADDL FAMILY COURT IN ORDERS ON IA NO.3 IN MC NO.4121/2019 AND ETC. -2- THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

ORAL ORDER

The memo is filed stating that the matter is settled via mediation in M.C.No.4121/2019 and hence, the petitioner does not want to pursue the matter.

2. Memo is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial