Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sulochana vs Anilkumar

Sulochana vs Anilkumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 25, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1661742

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/1014/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sulochana

Respondent

Anilkumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice k. babu monday, the 25th day of october 2021 / 3rd karthika, 1943 against the judgment/decree dated 30.03.2012 in as 122/2010 of iii additional district court, kollam os 280/2006 of munsiff magistrate court, south paravoorappellants/respondents/plaintiffs: 1 sulochana aged 56 years w/o prabhakaran, aswathy, thazhathucherry, meenadu village, chathannoor, kollam 2 lissy aged 24 years d/o suloshana, of do do by adv sri.k.s.manu respondents/appellants/defendants: 1 anilkumar aged 52 years s/o gopalakrishna pillai, vazhavilaveedu, thazhathucherry, meenadu village, chathannoor , kollam2 sunitha aged 48 years d/o thankachan, of do by adv sri.r.kishore this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 25.10.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellants submitted that, the appellants may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. a memo has been filed to that effect. the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- k.babu judge vpk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 3RD KARTHIKA, 1943 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT/DECREE DATED 30.03.2012 IN AS 122/2010 OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM OS 280/2006 OF MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, SOUTH PARAVOOR

APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS: 1 SULOCHANA AGED 56 YEARS W/O PRABHAKARAN, ASWATHY, THAZHATHUCHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM 2 LISSY AGED 24 YEARS D/O SULOSHANA, OF DO DO BY ADV SRI.K.S.MANU RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 ANILKUMAR AGED 52 YEARS S/O GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, VAZHAVILAVEEDU, THAZHATHUCHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANNOOR , KOLLAM

2 SUNITHA AGED 48 YEARS D/O THANKACHAN, OF DO BY ADV SRI.R.KISHORE THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that, the appellants may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. A memo has been filed to that effect. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- K.BABU JUDGE VPK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial