Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kannadhasan Vs The Sub Registrar

Kannadhasan vs The Sub Registrar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 29, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1661664

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/18023/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kannadhasan

Respondent

The Sub Registrar

Excerpt

.....the learned additional district court, ramanathapuram and obtained a decree declaring him as the guardian of the minor children of the said deceased jeyaraman and the said ponmani.5. the property that is now said to have been sold in favour of thepetitioner through the said alagukumar on the strength of the power of attorney dated 13.11.2025 executed by the said ponmani recites that the property is being sold for the benefit of the minors.6. since the second respondent has been appointed as the guardian of the minors in g.w.o.p.no.147 of 2019 by the learned additional page no. 3 of 5district judge, ramanathapuram, the impugned refusal check slip rejecting the registration of the sale deed said to have been executed on 19.06.2026 cannot be found fault with.7. it is open for the petitioner, as also his vendor namely ponmani,to take appropriate steps to set aside the order passed by the learned additional district judge, ramanathapuram, in g.w.o.p. no.147 of 2019 and thereafter approach the first respondent for registration of the sale deed dated 19.06.2026.8. therefore, this writ petition is closed with the above liberty. there shall be no order as to costs. 29.06.2026 jen ncc : yes / no index : yes / no to the sub registrar, office of the sub registrar, kamuthi, ramanathapuram district. page no. 4 of 5c.saravanan, j.jen 29.06.2026 page no. 5 of 5

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Kannadhasan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. 2.Ramraj ... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to impugned refusal slip dated 19.06.2026 issued by the first respondent vide RFL/Kamuthi/39/2026 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent herein to register the Sale Deed dated 19.06.2026 presented by the petitioner in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.316/10 admeasures to an extent of 2180 square feet bearing Patta No.2512 situated at Ramasamypatti Village, Melaramanadhi Group, Kamuthi Taluk, Kamuthi Sub Registration District, Ramanathapuram District within a stipulated time period in accordance with law.

Page No. 1 of 5 For Petitioner : Mr.G.Vishnuram For R1 : Mr.R.Parthiban Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu ******

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Refusal Check Slip dated 19.06.2026 issued by the first respondent vide RFL/Kamuthi/39/2026, quash the same as being illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to register the Sale Deed dated 19.06.2026 presented by the petitioner in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.316/10, measuring an extent of 2,180 square feet, covered by Patta No.2512, situated at Ramasamypatti Village, Melaramanadhi Group, Kamuthi Taluk, Kamuthi Sub-Registration District, Ramanathapuram District, within a stipulated period, in accordance with law.

2. The petitioner has purchased the property from one Ponmani on 19.06.2026 through her Power of Attorney, namely, one Alagukumar, in whose favour the Power of Attorney was executed on 13.11.2025. Page No. 2 of 5

3. The said Ponmani's husband, Jeyaraman, who had originally purchased the said land from one Sivakumar on 22.07.2013, died on 25.11.2018. They have two minor children.

4. The said Ponmani herself is an accused in S.C. No.27 of 2022

pending on the file of the learned Additional District Court, Paramakudi. While the petitioner's vendor, namely, the said Ponmani, was in prison in connection with the alleged murder of her husband on 25.11.2018, the second respondent moved a Guardianship Original Petition in G.W.O.P. No.147 of 2019 on the file of the learned Additional District Court, Ramanathapuram and obtained a decree declaring him as the guardian of the minor children of the said deceased Jeyaraman and the said Ponmani.

5. The property that is now said to have been sold in favour of the

petitioner through the said Alagukumar on the strength of the Power of Attorney dated 13.11.2025 executed by the said Ponmani recites that the property is being sold for the benefit of the minors.

6. Since the second respondent has been appointed as the guardian of the minors in G.W.O.P.No.147 of 2019 by the learned Additional Page No. 3 of 5

District Judge, Ramanathapuram, the impugned Refusal Check Slip rejecting the registration of the Sale Deed said to have been executed on 19.06.2026 cannot be found fault with.

7. It is open for the petitioner, as also his vendor namely Ponmani,

to take appropriate steps to set aside the order passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ramanathapuram, in G.W.O.P. No.147 of 2019 and thereafter approach the first respondent for registration of the Sale Deed dated 19.06.2026.

8. Therefore, this Writ Petition is closed with the above liberty. There shall be no order as to costs. 29.06.2026 JEN NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No To The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. Page No. 4 of 5

C.SARAVANAN, J.

JEN 29.06.2026 Page No. 5 of 5

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial