Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Satheesh, vs State of Kerala,

Satheesh, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 13, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1661140

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./6045/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satheesh,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice k.haripal friday, the 13th day of august 2021 / 22nd sravana, 1943 bail appl. no. 6045 of 2021 crime no. 18/2021 of excise range office, vandiperiyar, idukki petitioner/accused no. 2: satheesh, aged 33 years s/o. gopi, kecherikunnel house, mangattupady, bhagam, kidangoor village, kottayam district. by adv. k.s.arundasrespondent/complainant: state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682 031. by sri. prasanth m.p., public prosecutor this bail application having come up for admission on 13.08.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: bail appl.no.6045 of 2021 2orderthis is an application for regular bail moved by the accused in crime no. 18/2021 of the excise range office, vandiperiyar in idukki district, which was registered alleging offence under sections 20(b)(ii)(b) read with 25 and 29 of the ndps act. the petitioner was allegedly found in possession of 3.2 kgs of ganja and was arrested on 07.06.2021. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already undergone detention for more than 66 days.2. the learned public prosecutor has opposed the application, since he has two other cases against him under the ndps act.3. whatever it may be, if he has been in custody formore than 66 days and if final report is not laid, he is entitled to get statutory bail for which he can approach the special court. with these observations, this bail application is closed. sd/- k.haripal judge dcs/13.08.2021

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 22ND SRAVANA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 6045 OF 2021 CRIME NO. 18/2021 OF EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, VANDIPERIYAR, IDUKKI PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. 2: SATHEESH, AGED 33 YEARS S/O. GOPI, KECHERIKUNNEL HOUSE, MANGATTUPADY, BHAGAM, KIDANGOOR VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. K.S.ARUNDAS

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031. BY SRI. PRASANTH M.P., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Bail Appl.No.6045 OF 2021 2

ORDER

This is an application for regular bail moved by the accused in Crime No. 18/2021 of the Excise Range Office, Vandiperiyar in Idukki district, which was registered alleging offence under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) read with 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner was allegedly found in possession of 3.2 kgs of ganja and was arrested on 07.06.2021. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already undergone detention for more than 66 days.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application, since he has two other cases against him under the NDPS Act.

3. Whatever it may be, if he has been in custody for

more than 66 days and if final report is not laid, he is entitled to get statutory bail for which he can approach the Special Court. With these observations, this bail application is closed. Sd/- K.HARIPAL JUDGE DCS/13.08.2021

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial