Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Milton vs Mary

Milton vs MARY

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 22, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1661113

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/236/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Milton

Respondent

MARY

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice basant balaji wednesday, the 22nd day of december 2021 / 1st pousha, 1943 rpfc no. 236 of 2016 against the order in mc 66/2015 dated 5/05/2016 of family court,ernakulamrevision petitioner/respondent: milton s/o joseph, aged 35 years, thekkeveettil house, hospital junction, narakkal p.o., ernakulam-682505. by adv sri.a.t.anilkumar respondents/petitioners: 1 mary w/o milton, aged 30 years, karangattu house, puthuvype p.o., ernakulam district-682508. 2 gail milton s/o milton, aged 8 years, karangattu house, puthuvyppe p.o., ernakulam district-682508 (represented by his mother mary k.j., ist respondent)other present: adv v shylaja for the petitioner this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 22.12.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: rp(fc) no. 236 of 2016orderdated this the 22nd day of december, 2021. the counsel for the revision petitioner submits that there is no instruction from her client. the order under challenge is anorder in m.p.no.161/2015 in m.c.no.66/2015 on the file of thefamily court at ernakulam which was passed as early as on 5.5.2016. in view of the matter, the r.p.(fc) is dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- basant balaji judge al/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 1ST POUSHA, 1943 RPFC NO. 236 OF 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 66/2015 DATED 5/05/2016 OF FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM

REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: MILTON S/O JOSEPH, AGED 35 YEARS, THEKKEVEETTIL HOUSE, HOSPITAL JUNCTION, NARAKKAL P.O., ERNAKULAM-682505. BY ADV SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 MARY W/O MILTON, AGED 30 YEARS, KARANGATTU HOUSE, PUTHUVYPE P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682508. 2 GAIL MILTON S/O MILTON, AGED 8 YEARS, KARANGATTU HOUSE, PUTHUVYPPE P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682508 (REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER MARY K.J., IST RESPONDENT)

OTHER PRESENT: ADV V SHYLAJA FOR THE PETITIONER THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RP(FC) No. 236 OF 2016

ORDER

Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2021. The counsel for the revision petitioner submits that there is no instruction from her client. The order under challenge is an

order in M.P.No.161/2015 in M.C.No.66/2015 on the file of the

Family Court at Ernakulam which was passed as early as on 5.5.2016. In view of the matter, the R.P.(FC) is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- BASANT BALAJI JUDGE al/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial