Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A.Angammal Vs The Assistant Engineer (Distribution)

A.Angammal vs The Assistant Engineer (Distribution)

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 29, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1660933

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/18116/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.Angammal

Respondent

The Assistant Engineer (Distribution)

Excerpt

.....of the second respondent.3. by consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.4. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that thepetitioner had made a representation dated 29.05.2026 seeking electricity connection for his house. however, as the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed the present writ petitio before this court.5. the learned counsel further submitted that it would suffice if thiscourt issues a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2026 and pass appropriate orders thereon within a time frame to be fixed by this court.6. considering the above facts and circumstances of the case andwithout expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents, to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.05.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no costs. 29.06.2026 ncc : yes / no index : yes / no internet : yes pkn to1. the assistant engineer (distribution), tamilnadu electricity generation and distribution corporation limited (tangedco), subramaniyapuram, power house road, madurai- 625.2. the tahsildar, madurai south taluk, madurai.m.dhandapani,j.pknorder made indated : 29.06.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI A.Angammal ... Petitioner(s) vs.

1. The Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (Tangedco), Subramaniyapuram, Power House Road, Madurai- 625.

2. The Tahsildar, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai. ... Respondent(s)

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to provide the electricity service connection to the petitioners house in D.No.44, J.R. Road, Venkatchalapuram, Subramaniyapuram, Madurai by taking the indemnity

bond based on the representation dated 29.05.2026 within the time as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Ms.S.Jansirani For R2 : Mr.R.Ramasamy, Counsel for State For R1 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to provide electricity service connection to the petitioner’s house bearing Door No. 44, J.R. Road, Venkatchalapuram, Subramaniyapuram, Madurai, by obtaining an indemnity bond based on the representation dated 29.05.2026, within such time as may be fixed by this Court.

2. Heard Ms.S.Jansirani, learned counsel for the petitioner;

Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, learned Standing Counsel, appearing on behalf of the first respondent and Mr.R.Ramasamy, learned Counsel for the State, appearing on behalf of the second respondent.

3. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner had made a representation dated 29.05.2026 seeking electricity connection for his house. However, as the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed the present writ petitio before this Court.

5. The learned counsel further submitted that it would suffice if this

Court issues a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2026 and pass appropriate orders thereon within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and

without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents, to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.05.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 29.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PKN To

1. The Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (Tangedco), Subramaniyapuram, Power House Road, Madurai- 625.

2. The Tahsildar, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai.

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

PKN

ORDER MADE IN

DATED : 29.06.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial