Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Geetha John, vs State of Kerala,

Geetha John, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 07, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1660300

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/16542/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Geetha John,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.nagaresh friday, the 07th day of may 2021/17th vaisakha, 1943 wp(c) no. 16542 of 2020petitioner: geetha john, house no.10/517b31, no.1, noel palm dale, rajagiri, kochi-682 039. by adv. k.p.santhi respondents: state of kerala, represented by the secretary to government, 1 revenue department, secretariat, thiruvananthapuram-695 001. the district collector, civil station, kakkanad, ernakulam, kochi-682 030. the revenue divisional officer, 3 revenue divisional office, fortkochi. the tahsildar, kanayannur taluk, 4 park avenue road, kochi-682 011. the local level monitoring committee, 5 krishi bhavan, thrikkakara, represented by the convener, ernakulam-682 030. this writ petition (civil) having been finally heard on 07.05.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no.16542/2020judgmentdated this the 7th day of may, 2021 the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner does not want to prosecute this writ petition and hence the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. the writ petition is hence dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- n. nagaresh judge ncd/17.05.2021

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF MAY 2021/17TH VAISAKHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 16542 OF 2020

PETITIONER: GEETHA JOHN, HOUSE NO.10/517B31, NO.1, NOEL PALM DALE, RAJAGIRI, KOCHI-682 039. BY ADV. K.P.SANTHI RESPONDENTS: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, 1 REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 030. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, 3 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, FORTKOCHI. THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, 4 PARK AVENUE ROAD, KOCHI-682 011. THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, 5 KRISHI BHAVAN, THRIKKAKARA, REPRESENTED BY THE CONVENER, ERNAKULAM-682 030. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.05.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No.16542/2020

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 7th day of May, 2021 The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner does not want to prosecute this writ petition and hence the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is hence dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE ncd/17.05.2021

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial