Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The State of Karnataka vs Ranjith Poojary

The State of Karnataka vs Ranjith Poojary

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Aug 29, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1660197

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/2019/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The State of Karnataka

Respondent

Ranjith Poojary

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 29th day of august, 2025 before the hon'ble ms. justice j.m.khazi criminal petition no. 2019 of 2022 (482(cr.pc) / 528(bnss)) between:1. the state of karnataka by inspector of police moodabidri police station d k district, mangaluru - 574227 represented by state public prosecutor high court building bengaluru2. state of karnataka by special executive magistrate and deputy commissioner of policedigitally (l and o) of mangaluru signed by d k district, mangaluru rekha r represented by state public prosecutorlocation: high court high court building, bengaluru of …petitioners karnataka (by sri.vinay mahadevaiah, hcgp) and: ranjith poojary s/o ramachandra poojary aged about 35 years resident at bardilla house thodaru village, -2- mangaluru - 575001 …respondent (nil) this crl.p is filed u/s.482 cr.p.c by the spp for the state praying to set aside the order dated 15.02.2020 in crl.rp no.36/2019 passed by i additional district and sessions judge d.k., mangaluru. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble ms. justice j.m.khazioral orderlearned hcgp for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of this court to withdraw the petition.2. the aforesaid memo is placed on record.3. in the light of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.4. in view of disposal of petition, pendingapplication/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate orderis required. sd/- (j.m.khazi) judge asn list no.: 1 sl no.: 2

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2019 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE MOODABIDRI POLICE STATION D K DISTRICT, MANGALURU - 574227 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU

2. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Digitally          (L AND O) OF MANGALURU
signed by          D K DISTRICT, MANGALURU
REKHA R            REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Location: High Court HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU of …PETITIONERS Karnataka (BY SRI.VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP) AND: RANJITH POOJARY S/O RAMACHANDRA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDENT AT BARDILLA HOUSE THODARU VILLAGE, -2- MANGALURU - 575001 …RESPONDENT (NIL) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE SPP FOR THE STATE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.02.2020 IN CRL.RP NO.36/2019 PASSED BY I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE D.K., MANGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

ORAL ORDER

Learned HCGP for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition.

2. The aforesaid memo is placed on record.

3. In the light of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. In view of disposal of petition, pending

application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order

is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial