Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Thomas vs Sindhu

Thomas vs Sindhu

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 27, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1659815

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/670/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thomas

Respondent

Sindhu

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.anil kumar wednesday, the 27th day of january 2021 / 7th magha, 1942 as 44/2014 of sub court, perumbavoor os 230/2012 of munsiff court, perumbavoor appellant/s: thomas, s/o varkey, aged 66 years, palakunnel house, kadakkanad kara, by adv. sri.mathew sebastian respondent/s: 1 sindhu, w/o biju, aged 34 years, (now working at indian time house, m.c.p.building, kolencherry), pin-682 311. 2 akshay, s/o.biju, aged 17 years, (minor), represented by his mother sindhu, w/o.biju, pin-682 311. r1 by adv. sri.shiju varghese this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 27.01.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal is not pressed. evidencing the same, a memo dated 18.01.2021 has been filed. recording the memo, the regular second appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. there will be noorder as to costs. pending applications, if any,stand closed. sd/- n.anil kumar judge bka/27.01.2021

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 7TH MAGHA, 1942 AS 44/2014 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR OS 230/2012 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR APPELLANT/S: THOMAS, S/O VARKEY, AGED 66 YEARS, PALAKUNNEL HOUSE, KADAKKANAD KARA, BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 SINDHU, W/O BIJU, AGED 34 YEARS, (NOW WORKING AT INDIAN TIME HOUSE, M.C.P.BUILDING, KOLENCHERRY), PIN-682 311. 2 AKSHAY, S/O.BIJU, AGED 17 YEARS, (MINOR), REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER SINDHU, W/O.BIJU, PIN-682 311. R1 BY ADV. SRI.SHIJU VARGHESE THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal is not pressed. Evidencing the same, a memo dated 18.01.2021 has been filed. Recording the memo, the Regular Second Appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. There will be no

order as to costs. Pending applications, if any,

stand closed. Sd/- N.ANIL KUMAR JUDGE Bka/27.01.2021

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial