Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Kavin Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Kavin vs The State of Tamilnadu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 01, 2026
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1659636

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP(MD)/12277/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kavin

Respondent

The State of Tamilnadu

Excerpt

.....hospital and after two days, she died and hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.5.i have gone through the records and also the connected materials and it is a case of suicide and the deceased committed suicide based on the threat made by the petitioner.6. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the period of incarceration already undergone by the petitioner, and the fact that thepetitioner is a college student, this court is of the view that further incarceration is not necessary for the purpose of investigation or trial. accordingly, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions. [a] accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the additional mahila court, thanjavur, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the jurisdictional magistrate daily at 06.00 p.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; [c] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned magistrate/trial court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and thepetitioner released on bail by the learned magistrate/trial court himself as laid down by the hon'ble supreme court in p.k.shaji vs. state of kerala [(2005)13 scc 283]; [d] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh fir can be registered under section 269 of b.n.s. 29.06.2026 dss to:1. the additional mahila court, thanjavur.2. the inspector of police,thanjavur medical college police station, thanjavur district. 3.the superintendent, thanjavur sub jail. 4.the additional public prosecutor, madurai bench of madras high court, madurai. k. rajasekar,j dssorderin crl op(md) no.12277 of 2026 date : 01/07/2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01/07/2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Kavin ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Thanjavur Medical College Police Station, Thanjavur District. Cr.No.305/2026. ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No.305/2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Maheswaran R, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel For State of TN (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.05.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 131, 75(1), 78(1)(i), 351(2) & r/w Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.305 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was

studying college where the deceased, namely, Aruna, was studying. Since the deceased rejected the proposal of love made by the petitioner herein, the petitioner has attacked her with his hands and also threatened her with dire consequences. Unable to bear the same, she, after some time, consumed pesticide. Thereafter, the case was registered, and the petitioner has been arrested and in judicial custody from 26.05.2026 onwards.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that

the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He would further submit that there was no dispute between the petitioner and the deceased and

they were on cordial terms and were in a relationship, which was opposed by the family members of the deceased. Due to which, the deceased committed suicide by consuming pesticide. Hence, he prayed this Court to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu (Criminal

Side), appearing for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and, by producing the medical report and other documents, submitted that the deceased committed suicide due to the intimidation and threat made by the petitioner herein and she was admitted in the hospital and after two days, she died and hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.I have gone through the records and also the connected materials and it is a case of suicide and the deceased committed suicide based on the threat made by the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the period of incarceration already undergone by the petitioner, and the fact that the

petitioner is a college student, this Court is of the view that further incarceration is not necessary for the purpose of investigation or trial. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions. [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Additional Mahila Court, Thanjavur, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the jurisdictional Magistrate daily at 06.00 p.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; [c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the

petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [d] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 29.06.2026 dss To:

1. The Additional Mahila Court, Thanjavur.

2. The Inspector of Police,

Thanjavur Medical College Police Station, Thanjavur District. 3.The Superintendent, Thanjavur Sub Jail. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. K. RAJASEKAR,J DSS

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12277 of 2026 Date : 01/07/2026

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Kavin vs The State of Tamilnadu Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales