Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bhavanan vs the State of Kerala

Bhavanan vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 17, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1658399

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./5765/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhavanan

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. tuesday, the 17th day of august 2021 / 26th sravana, 1943 bail appl. no. 5765 of 2021 petitioner: bhavanan aged 36 years tharayil parambu, manappuram p.o., thaykkattussery, cherthala, alappuzha - 688 526. by advs. v.mahendranath p.t.sheejish respondents: 1 the state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam - 682 031. 2 station house officer poochakkal police station, cherthala, alappuzha - 688 526. by adv. sri.sudheer pp this bail application having come up for admission on 17.08.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: bail appl. no. 5765 of 2021 2orderthis is an application filed u/s 438 of code of criminal procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. this petition was submitted by the petitioner as heapprehended arrest by the 2 nd respondent in respect of a cognizable offence. the learned public prosecutor upon instruction submits that crime no. 519/2021 is registered against the petitioner by the 2nd respondent for the offence punishable under section 447, 294(b), 323, 324 r/w 506(i) and section 3(ii)(v)(a) of the scheduled caste and scheduled tribe (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989.3. on going through the offences alleged against thepetitioner it can be seen that all the offences are bailable. in the such circumstances this anticipatory bail application is closed leaving the petitioner with liberty to seek for regular bail before the jurisdictional court by submitting appropriate application in this regard. all the contentions are left open. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a., judge ska

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 26TH SRAVANA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 5765 OF 2021 PETITIONER: BHAVANAN AGED 36 YEARS THARAYIL PARAMBU, MANAPPURAM P.O., THAYKKATTUSSERY, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA - 688 526. BY ADVS. V.MAHENDRANATH P.T.SHEEJISH RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER POOCHAKKAL POLICE STATION, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA - 688 526. BY ADV. SRI.SUDHEER PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BAIL APPL. NO. 5765 OF 2021 2

ORDER

This is an application filed u/s 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. This petition was submitted by the petitioner as he

apprehended arrest by the 2 nd respondent in respect of a cognizable offence. The learned Public Prosecutor upon instruction submits that Crime No. 519/2021 is registered against the petitioner by the 2nd respondent for the offence punishable under Section 447, 294(b), 323, 324 r/w 506(i) and Section 3(ii)(v)(a) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

3. On going through the offences alleged against the

petitioner it can be seen that all the offences are bailable. In the such circumstances this anticipatory bail application is closed leaving the petitioner with liberty to seek for regular bail before the jurisdictional court by submitting appropriate application in this regard. All the contentions are left open. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JUDGE ska

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial