Krishnakumar vs Sangitha

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 25, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1658182

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1658182
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Basant Balaji
Decided On: Oct 25, 2021
Case Number: RPFC/393/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnakumar

Respondent

Sangitha

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice basant balaji monday, the 25th day of october 2021/3rd karthika, 1943 r.p.(f.c.) no.393 of 2015 (against the order dated 16.4.2015 in mc 197/2013 of family court, irinjalakuda, thrissur) revision petitioner/respondent: krishnakumar, aged 29 years, s/o.ramakrishnan, puthenpurathodika veed, chembrassery p.o., kodassery, ernad taluk, malappuram district. by advs. sri.p.samsudin sri.k.c.antony mathew sri.jithin lukose respondent/petitioner: sagitha, aged 22 years, d/o.chandran, kuzhuppilly house, nenmanikkara p.o., thrissur district-680 301. this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 25.10.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderthe above revision is filed against the order in m.c.no.197 of 2013 on the file of the family court, irinjalakuda, whereby the wife claimed maintenance under section 125 of the code of criminal procedure. the family court by order dated 16.4.2015 allowed the wife to realise an amount of rs.5,000/- as litigation cost and rs.3,500/- as monthly maintenance from september 2003 onwards. today when the case is called up, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner sri.p.samsudin represents that the matter between the parties have been settled out of court and a decree of divorce has already been obtained under mutual consent. in the afore said reason, he does not proceed the r.p(fc). recording the above submission, the r.p.(fc) is closed. sd/- basant balaji, ss judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021/3RD KARTHIKA, 1943 R.P.(F.C.) NO.393 OF 2015 (AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.4.2015 IN MC 197/2013 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR) REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: KRISHNAKUMAR, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, PUTHENPURATHODIKA VEED, CHEMBRASSERY P.O., KODASSERY, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN SRI.K.C.ANTONY MATHEW SRI.JITHIN LUKOSE RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: SAGITHA, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O.CHANDRAN, KUZHUPPILLY HOUSE, NENMANIKKARA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 301. THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The above revision is filed against the order in M.C.No.197 of 2013 on the file of the Family Court, Irinjalakuda, whereby the wife claimed maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Family Court by order dated 16.4.2015 allowed the wife to realise an amount of Rs.5,000/- as litigation cost and Rs.3,500/- as monthly maintenance from September 2003 onwards. Today when the case is called up, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner Sri.P.Samsudin represents that the matter between the parties have been settled out of court and a decree of divorce has already been obtained under mutual consent. In the afore said reason, he does not proceed the R.P(FC). Recording the above submission, the R.P.(FC) is closed. Sd/- BASANT BALAJI, ss JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties Krishnakumar vs Sangitha Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Basant Balaji