Santoshi Singh vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Mar 27, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1657953

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1657953
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
Decided On: Mar 27, 2025
Case Number: WP/25717/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Santoshi Singh

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....by vidya g r location: high 1. state of karnataka court of karnataka represented by its secretary, department of urban development, vikasa soudha, bengaluru - 560 001.2. the commissioner bruhath bangalore mahanagara palike, bbmp head office premises, nr square, bengaluru - 560 002. -2-3. the medical officer of healthyelahanka range, byatrayanpura, bengaluru - 560 092. …respondents (by sri. yoganna k.p, aga for r1, sri. prashanth s.h advocate for r2 & r3) this w.p. is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to quash the impugned notice dtd 31.5.2017 passed by the r-3 herein [annexure-a] grant an interim order to stay any further proceedings or actions that may be initiated by the respondents herein pursuant to the impugned notice dtd 31.5.2017 issued by the r-3 [annexure-a and restrain the respondents from taking any coercive action against the petitioner and the pre-school. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing in b-group, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr justice s sunil dutt yadav -3-oral ordermemo for withdrawal has been filed which reads as hereunder:"the petitioner herein most humbly submit that since the complainants who gave complaint to respondents against petitioner have withdrawn their complaint as presently they do not have any grievance from petitioner and the petitioner intends to withdraw this petition filed against respondents in the interest of justice."in light of the same, petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- (s sunil dutt yadav) judge dha list no.: 1 sl no.: 34.1

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 25717 OF 2017 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SANTOSHI SINGH PROPRIETOR, EUROKIDS VIDYARANYAPURA, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.802, 7TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH BLOCK, BEL LAYOUT, VIDYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 097. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PHANIRAJ KASHYAP., ADVOCATE)

AND: Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA COURT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BBMP HEAD OFFICE PREMISES, NR SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 002. -2-

3. THE MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH

YELAHANKA RANGE, BYATRAYANPURA, BENGALURU - 560 092. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGANNA K.P, AGA FOR R1, SRI. PRASHANTH S.H ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DTD 31.5.2017 PASSED BY THE R-3 HEREIN [ANNEXURE-A] GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY ANY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS OR ACTIONS THAT MAY BE INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN PURSUANT TO THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DTD 31.5.2017 ISSUED BY THE R-3 [ANNEXURE-A AND RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENTS FROM TAKING ANY COERCIVE ACTION AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND THE PRE-SCHOOL. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV -3-

ORAL ORDER

Memo for withdrawal has been filed which reads as hereunder:

"The petitioner herein most humbly submit that since the complainants who gave complaint to respondents against petitioner have withdrawn their complaint as presently they do not have any grievance from petitioner and the petitioner intends to withdraw this petition filed against respondents in the interest of justice."

In light of the same, petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34.1

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Santoshi Singh vs State of Karnataka Same Judge S Sunil Dutt Yadav