Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abhijith .T.a vs State of Kerala

Abhijith .T.a vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 30, 2021
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1657166

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./5663/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abhijith .T.a

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....19 years old, that no criminal bail appl.no.5663 of 2021 3 antecedents is noticed against him.5. the petitioner is an young boy of 19 years; he doesnot have criminal antecedents; he is in custody from 24.07.2021 onwards; the stolen articles have already been recovered and therefore, his further detention is not necessary.6. moreover, it is submitted that the matter has beensettled and the petitioner is intending to move this court for quashing the proceedings. whatever it may be, his continued detention is not warranted and the petitioner shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the ii) he shall not try to contact or influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence; iii) he shall not involve in any crime during the bail period; iv) he shall not leave the country without permission of the v) he shall appear before the committal court/trial court as and when required;vi) the petitioner shall strictly follow the various guidelinesissued by the state and central governments with bail appl.no.5663 of 2021 4 respect to keeping of social distancing in the wake of covid 19 pandemic; vii) if any of the above conditions are violated by the petitioner, the jurisdictional court will be at liberty to cancel the bail in accordance with law. this bail application is allowed as above. sd/- k.haripal judge dcs/30.07.2021

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 5663 OF 2021 CRIME NO.916/2021 OF HILL PALACE POLICE STATION, THRIPUNITHURA, PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. 1: ABHIJITH .T.A AGED 19 YEARS S/O. ANILKUMAR T.P. MUREKKATTU HOUSE NEAR POTTA TEMPLE, EROOR WEST P.O. THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM - 682 306 BY ADV. VIVEK VENUGOPAL RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA KOCHI - 682 031 SRI. SANTHOSH PETER, SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Bail Appl.No.5663 OF 2021 2

ORDER

This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Petitioner is the first accused in Crime No. 916/2021 of Hill Palace Police Station, Thripunithura which was registered alleging offence under Sections 454, 461, 380 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The other two persons are juvenile-in-conflict with law.

2. It is alleged that the petitioner and other two persons

in furtherance of their common intention had committed theft of an amount of Rs.4,000/- and also stolen brass light lamps worth Rs.6,500/- and Rs.2,500/- from the temple; later on 24.07.2021, the accused was arrested by the police and since then is in judicial custody.

3. I heard the learned counsel on both sides.

Highlighting Annexure 1 remand report, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the stolen articles have already been recovered on the basis of the information furnished by the petitioner and that his further detention is not warranted.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor also endorsed the submission that he is only 19 years old, that no criminal Bail Appl.No.5663 OF 2021 3 antecedents is noticed against him.

5. The petitioner is an young boy of 19 years; he does

not have criminal antecedents; he is in custody from 24.07.2021 onwards; the stolen articles have already been recovered and therefore, his further detention is not necessary.

6. Moreover, it is submitted that the matter has been

settled and the petitioner is intending to move this Court for quashing the proceedings. Whatever it may be, his continued detention is not warranted and the petitioner shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the ii) He shall not try to contact or influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence; iii) He shall not involve in any crime during the bail period; iv) He shall not leave the country without permission of the v) He shall appear before the committal court/trial court as and when required;

vi) The petitioner shall strictly follow the various guidelines

issued by the State and Central Governments with Bail Appl.No.5663 OF 2021 4 respect to keeping of social distancing in the wake of Covid 19 pandemic; vii) If any of the above conditions are violated by the petitioner, the jurisdictional Court will be at liberty to cancel the bail in accordance with law. This bail application is allowed as above. SD/- K.HARIPAL JUDGE DCS/30.07.2021

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial