Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sreejith vs State of Kerala

Sreejith vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 02, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1656331

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./5603/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sreejith

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice k.haripal monday, the 2nd day of august 2021 / 11th sravana, 1943 bail appl. no. 5603 of 2021 crime no. 18/2021 of excise range office, vandiperiyar, idukki applicant/accused no. 1: sreejith aged 23 years s/o.jijikuttan, eloor house, mosco kara, moonnilavu village, meenachil thaluk, kottayam district. by adv. k.s.arundas respondent/complainant: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, pin - 682 031. by sri. prasanth m.p., public prosecutor this bail application having come up for admission on 02.08.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: bail appl.no.5603 of 2021 2orderthis is the second application for bail moved by the first accused in crime no. 18/2021 of excise range office, vandiperiyar, which was registered alleging offence under sections 20(b)(ii)(b), 25 and 29 of the ndps act. the crime was registered after seizing 3.2 kgs of ganja from the possession of the petitioner on 07.06.2021. the learned counsel submits that he is in custody for the last 55 days; that he has no criminal antecedents to his credit.2. but this statement has been rebutted by the learnedpublic prosecutor. according to him, there are two earlier ndps act cases, i.e., crime no. 13/2017 of vandiperiyar excise range and crime no. 63/2018 of udumbanchola excise range registered against him and that in both cases, the petitioner stands convicted. that means, he is virtually a habitual offender. it is true that the earlier application for bail was dismissed by this court on 15.07.2021. bail appl.no.5603 of 2021 33. considering these aspects, since the source ofcontraband is not yet traced and having regard to the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, he cannot be released on bail. the application is dismissed. sd/- k.haripal judge dcs/02.08.2021

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 5603 OF 2021 CRIME NO. 18/2021 OF EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, VANDIPERIYAR, IDUKKI APPLICANT/ACCUSED NO. 1: SREEJITH AGED 23 YEARS S/O.JIJIKUTTAN, ELOOR HOUSE, MOSCO KARA, MOONNILAVU VILLAGE, MEENACHIL THALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. K.S.ARUNDAS RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031. BY SRI. PRASANTH M.P., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Bail Appl.No.5603 OF 2021 2

ORDER

This is the second application for bail moved by the first accused in Crime No. 18/2021 of Excise Range Office, Vandiperiyar, which was registered alleging offence under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The crime was registered after seizing 3.2 kgs of ganja from the possession of the petitioner on 07.06.2021. The learned counsel submits that he is in custody for the last 55 days; that he has no criminal antecedents to his credit.

2. But this statement has been rebutted by the learned

Public Prosecutor. According to him, there are two earlier NDPS Act cases, i.e., Crime No. 13/2017 of Vandiperiyar Excise Range and Crime No. 63/2018 of Udumbanchola Excise Range registered against him and that in both cases, the petitioner stands convicted. That means, he is virtually a habitual offender. It is true that the earlier application for bail was dismissed by this Court on 15.07.2021. Bail Appl.No.5603 OF 2021 3

3. Considering these aspects, since the source of

contraband is not yet traced and having regard to the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, he cannot be released on bail. The application is dismissed. Sd/- K.HARIPAL JUDGE DCS/02.08.2021

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial