Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gracious Kuriakose vs Niassam

Gracious Kuriakose vs Niassam

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 12, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1655466

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/1114/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gracious Kuriakose

Respondent

Niassam

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran thursday, the 12th day of august 2021 / 21st sravana, 1943 against the judgment in wp(c) 10221/2021 of high court of kerala, ernakulam petitioner/1st petitioner in wpc.no.10221/2021: gracious kuriakose aged 62 years senior advocate, s/o. kuriakose, residing at nambiaparambil house, shenoy road, kaloor, ernakulam - 682017. by adv lal george respondent/respondent no.4 in wpc.no.10221/2021: niassam (age and name of the father not known to the petitioner), secretary, corporation of cochin, corporation office, park avenue road, ernakulam - 682 011. by adv k.janardhana shenoy this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 12.08.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthis contempt case has been filed on the allegation that the directions in the judgment have not been complied with within the time frame granted therein.2. however, through a separate order in i.a.no.1/2021 inw.p.(c)no.10221/2021, i extended the time frame in the judgmentuntil 06.09.2021. obviously, therefore, this contempt case has now become incapable of further prosecution. it is, therefore, closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach this court again, if the directions are not complied with even within the extended time frame. sd/- devan ramachandran judge rp appendix of con.case(c) 1114/2021 petitioner annexure annexure a1 true copy of the wp(c) 10221/21 judgment dated 07.05.2021 is produced. annexure a2 copy of the said lawyer notice dated 11.06.2021 is produced.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 21ST SRAVANA, 1943 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 10221/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/1st PETITIONER IN WPC.NO.10221/2021: GRACIOUS KURIAKOSE AGED 62 YEARS SENIOR ADVOCATE, S/O. KURIAKOSE, RESIDING AT NAMBIAPARAMBIL HOUSE, SHENOY ROAD, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM - 682017. BY ADV LAL GEORGE RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.4 IN WPC.NO.10221/2021: NIASSAM (AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, CORPORATION OFFICE, PARK AVENUE ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 011. BY ADV K.JANARDHANA SHENOY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

This Contempt Case has been filed on the allegation that the directions in the judgment have not been complied with within the time frame granted therein.

2. However, through a separate order in I.A.No.1/2021 in

W.P.(C)No.10221/2021, I extended the time frame in the judgment

until 06.09.2021. Obviously, therefore, this Contempt Case has now become incapable of further prosecution. It is, therefore, closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court again, if the directions are not complied with even within the extended time frame. SD/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE rp APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1114/2021 PETITIONER ANNEXURE Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE WP(C) 10221/21 JUDGMENT DATED 07.05.2021 IS PRODUCED. Annexure A2 COPY OF THE SAID LAWYER NOTICE DATED 11.06.2021 IS PRODUCED.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial