Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M.G.Usha vs Salimkumar

M.G.Usha vs Salimkumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Nov 25, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1655016

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/861/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.G.Usha

Respondent

Salimkumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan thursday, the 25th day of november 2021 / 4th agrahayana, 1943 against the judgment and decree dated 07.08.2014 in os 38/2013 of sub court, perumbavoor, ernakulam cmcp 3/2015 of high court of kerala, ernakulam appellant/defendant: m.g.usha aged 50 years w/o.late ramachandran nair, mundackal house, okkal p.o., chelamattom kara, chelamattom village, ernakulam district. sri.m.k.dileepan sri.deepak t.nedungadan smt.p.sumithra respondent/plaintiff salimkumar, aged about 58 years, s/o.karunakaran, kaprakkattu house, kanjirakkadu kara, perumbavoor village, kunnathunadu taluk, ernakulam district-683 542. sri.anilkumar s sri.t.p.ramachandran thacheth smt.n.g.sindhu this regular first appeal having come up for hearing on 25.11.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe judgment of this court dated 11.11.2021 is recalled.2. the appellant sought permission towithdraw the appeal. hence, the same is allowed. the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. the appellant shall pay the court fee within one month from today, failing which, the registry shall send the decree to thedistrict collector for recovery under orderxxxiii rule 14 c.p.c. sd/- p.somarajan judge spv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.08.2014 IN OS 38/2013 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM CMCP 3/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: M.G.USHA AGED 50 YEARS W/O.LATE RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, MUNDACKAL HOUSE, OKKAL P.O., CHELAMATTOM KARA, CHELAMATTOM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. SRI.M.K.DILEEPAN SRI.DEEPAK T.NEDUNGADAN SMT.P.SUMITHRA RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF SALIMKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O.KARUNAKARAN, KAPRAKKATTU HOUSE, KANJIRAKKADU KARA, PERUMBAVOOR VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 542. SRI.ANILKUMAR S SRI.T.P.RAMACHANDRAN THACHETH SMT.N.G.SINDHU THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 25.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The judgment of this Court dated 11.11.2021 is recalled.

2. The appellant sought permission to

withdraw the appeal. Hence, the same is allowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant shall pay the court fee within one month from today, failing which, the Registry shall send the decree to the

District Collector for recovery under Order

XXXIII Rule 14 C.P.C. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE SPV

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial