Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Boopathi Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Boopathi vs The State of Tamilnadu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 24, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1653452

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
HCP(MD)/783/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Boopathi

Respondent

The State of Tamilnadu

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 24.06.2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice n. anand venkatesh and the hon'ble mr justice k.k.ramakrishnan boopathi .. petitioner vs. 2.the state represented by the inspector of police, sivagangai district. .. respondents prayer :petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of habeas corpus, directing the respondent herein to secure and produce the body of the detenue, namely, sharmila, daughter of jayasankar and boopathi, aged about 19 years, who has been missing since 04.06.2026, before this court and after ascertaining the facts and circumstances of the case. for petitioner : mr.r.rajeskumar for respondents : mr.d.venkatesh, counsel for the state of tamil nadu (criminal side)order(order of the court was made by n. anand venkatesh,j.) when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.2. in view of the above, this habeas corpus petition stands dismissedas withdrawn. (n.a.v.,j..) (k.k.r.k.,j.,) index : yes / no internet : yes / no tsg to 2.the inspector of police, 3.the additional public prosecutor, madurai bench of madras high court, madurai.n. anand venkatesh,j.andk.k.ramakrishnan,j.tsg

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.06.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Boopathi .. Petitioner Vs. 2.The State represented by the Inspector of Police, Sivagangai District. .. Respondents Prayer :Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondent herein to secure and produce the body of the detenue, namely, Sharmila, daughter of Jayasankar and Boopathi, aged about 19 years, who has been missing since 04.06.2026, before this Court and after ascertaining the facts and circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajeskumar For Respondents : Mr.D.Venkatesh, Counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.) When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

2. In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed

as withdrawn. (N.A.V.,J..) (K.K.R.K.,J.,) Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TSG To 2.The Inspector of Police, 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.

AND

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J.

TSG

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial