Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suhail vs State of Kerala

Suhail vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 29, 2021
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1652477

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/3031/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suhail

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....the court on the same day delivered the following:o r d e rdated this the 29th day of july 2021 the petitioners are accused 1 and 2 in crime no.50/2020 of nadapuram police station for having allegedly committed the offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 308 and 427 read with section 34 of the i.p.c., which is now pending before the judicial first class magistrate court-i, nadapuram as c.p.no.67/2020.2. the de facto complainant is the 2nd respondentherein. the petitioners state that the matter has been amicably settled with the de facto complainant and that the entire proceedings against them may be quashed. the de facto complainant has also appeared through a counsel and filed an affidavit to the effect that the matter has been settled with the petitioners and that he has no objection in quashing the proceedings against them. the de facto complainant had allegedly sustained a clavicle fracture, which definitely is not life-threatening. the learned public prosecutor has got instructions regarding the genuineness of the settlement. the petitioners do not have any other criminal antecedents. there is no public interest involved.3. resultantly, the crl.m.c. is allowed and theentire proceedings as against the petitioners in crime no.50/2020 of nadapuram police station, presently pending as c.p.no.67/2020 on the files of the judicial first class magistrate court-i, nadapuram, shall stand quashed under section 482 of cr.p.c. and the petitioners are discharged and set at liberty. sd/- ashok menon judge dkr appendix of crl.mc 3031/2021 petitioner annexure annexure a1 certified copy of the final report/charge sheet in crime no.50/2020 of nadapuram police station,kozhikode district. annexure a2 the affidavit solemnly affirmed by the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1943 CRL.MC NO. 3031 OF 2021 CRIME NO.50/2020 OF NADAPURAM POLICE STATION AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CP 67/2020 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, NADAPURAM, KOZHIKODE

PETITIONER/S: 1 SUHAIL AGED 30 YEARS S/O MOOSA HAJI,RESIDING AT PUTHEN PURAYIL HOUSE, PERODE.P.O, KUTTIYADI,VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,PIN-673504. 2 ISMAIL, AGED 30 YEARS S/O AMMAD,RESIDING AT METALE VADAKKE KANIYIL HOUSE, PERODE.P.O, KUTTIYADI,VADAKARA TALUK,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673504. BY ADVS. J.R.PREM NAVAZ SUMEEN S. RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM-682031. 2 ABOOBACKER, AGED 33 YEARS S/O AMMED,RESIDING AT THATTARATH HOUSE,P.O.PERODE, VELLOOR AMSOM,PERODE AMSOM,VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,PIN-673504. R1 BY SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK-SR.PP R2 BY ADV AJOY VENU OTHER PRESENT: THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

Dated this the 29th day of July 2021 The petitioners are accused 1 and 2 in Crime No.50/2020 of Nadapuram Police Station for having allegedly committed the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 308 and 427 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C., which is now pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Nadapuram as C.P.No.67/2020.

2. The de facto complainant is the 2nd respondent

herein. The petitioners state that the matter has been amicably settled with the de facto complainant and that the entire proceedings against them may be quashed. The de facto complainant has also appeared through a Counsel and filed an affidavit to the effect that the matter has been settled with the petitioners and that he has no objection in quashing the proceedings against them. The de facto complainant had allegedly sustained a clavicle fracture, which definitely is not life-threatening. The learned Public Prosecutor has got instructions regarding the genuineness of the settlement. The petitioners do not have any other criminal antecedents. There is no public interest involved.

3. Resultantly, the Crl.M.C. is allowed and the

entire proceedings as against the petitioners in Crime No.50/2020 of Nadapuram Police Station, presently pending as C.P.No.67/2020 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Nadapuram, shall stand quashed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and the petitioners are discharged and set at liberty. Sd/- ASHOK MENON JUDGE dkr APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 3031/2021 PETITIONER ANNEXURE Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT/CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.50/2020 OF NADAPURAM POLICE STATION,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. Annexure A2 THE AFFIDAVIT SOLEMNLY AFFIRMED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial