Dasaiah vs Kade Gowda

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 30, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1651913

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1651913
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: H.P.Sandesh
Decided On: Jun 30, 2025
Case Number: RSA/204/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dasaiah

Respondent

Kade Gowda

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 30th day of june, 2025 before the hon'ble mr justice h.p.sandesh regular second appeal no.204 of 2023 (inj) between: dasaiah s/o. late kalyanamma since deceased by lrs1. jayamma w/o. late dasaiah, aged about 64 years,2. venkatesh aged about 44 years,3. raju digitally signed aged about 42 years, by devika m location: high 4. govindaraju court of karnataka s/o. dasaiah, aged about 37 years,5. srinivas aged about 38 years, …appellants (by sri. parashiva prasad h m, advocate [ absent]) -2- and: kade gowda s/o. channabasavegowda by lrs & others1. smt. sowbhagaya w/o. late kade gowda, aged about 62 years,2. sukanya aged about 42 years,3. sowmya aged about 40 years,4. swetha aged about 31 years,5. sachin aged about 28 years, …respondents (by sri. anil kumar s, advocate) this rsa is filed under section 100 of cpc, against the judgment and decree dated 27.09.2022 passed in r.a.no.07/2016 on the file of the senior civil judge and jmfc, channapatna and etc. this appeal, coming on for admission, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:-3- coram: hon'ble mr justice h.p.sandeshoral judgmentnone appears for the appellants. on 16.06.2025, the counsel for the appellants was absent and the counsel for respondents was present. today also, the counsel for respondents is present and the counsel for the appellants is absent. this court, on 16.06.2025, also made it clear that if the counsel for the appellants does not appear on the next date of hearing, the appeal will be dismissed. inspite of the said order, the counsel for the appellants is not pursuing the matter diligently. hence, in view of order dated 16.06.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- (h.p.sandesh) judge sn

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.204 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN: DASAIAH S/O. LATE KALYANAMMA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS
1. JAYAMMA W/O. LATE DASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
2. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
3. RAJU Digitally signed AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH 4. GOVINDARAJU COURT OF KARNATAKA S/O. DASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
5. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PARASHIVA PRASAD H M, ADVOCATE [ ABSENT]) -2- AND: KADE GOWDA S/O. CHANNABASAVEGOWDA BY LRS & OTHERS
1. SMT. SOWBHAGAYA W/O. LATE KADE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
2. SUKANYA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
3. SOWMYA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
4. SWETHA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
5. SACHIN AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR S, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.09.2022 PASSED IN R.A.NO.07/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

-3- CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

ORAL JUDGMENT

None appears for the appellants. On 16.06.2025, the counsel for the appellants was absent and the counsel for respondents was present. Today also, the counsel for respondents is present and the counsel for the appellants is absent. This Court, on 16.06.2025, also made it clear that if the counsel for the appellants does not appear on the next date of hearing, the appeal will be dismissed. Inspite of the said order, the counsel for the appellants is not pursuing the matter diligently. Hence, in view of order dated 16.06.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Dasaiah vs Kade Gowda Same Judge H.P.Sandesh